I think it’s what Flus and Getsy have said previously...thats the best way they believe to beat a blitz heavy defense. I don't disagree with that totally...it gets the ball out quick, my biggest issue is that there was nothing built off of any of those plays to slow the db's down from crashing hard on the receivers. Getsy never made them second guess themselves one time! And my God it became so obvious when they were being called. And the lack of in breaking routes to the middle of the field when they were leaving it wide open was maddening!
Troy Aikman was complaining that Vikes weren’t blitzing Fields enough. Throwing a dozen WR screens will discourage the opponents from blitzing. So it worked from that perspective, but it doesn’t score points.
Now let’s see whether the Bears learned anything and will open up the offense in the coming games. If they stick to what they have been doing, the darker theories come into play.
So according to ESPN the Vikings blitzed Fields on 52% of his drop backs. In comparison, in their first meeting, the Vikings blitzed Fields on 71% of his drop backs(12 of 17), and they blitzed Bagent on 93% of his drop backs!!! So maybe Aikman was right.
I know someone mentioned that maybe Getsy doesn't trust Fields to throw the ball down the field...and that would be one of the dumbest things ever, and be just another of many indictments on Getsy. Fields has thrown 5 touchdowns and one interception with a passer rating of 112.5 on throws of 20+ air yards this season. CLEARLY the dude can throw it down the field.
Troy Aikman was complaining that Vikes weren’t blitzing Fields enough. Throwing a dozen WR screens will discourage the opponents from blitzing. So it worked from that perspective, but it doesn’t score points.
Now let’s see whether the Bears learned anything and will open up the offense in the coming games. If they stick to what they have been doing, the darker theories come into play.
So according to ESPN the Vikings blitzed Fields on 52% of his drop backs. In comparison, in their first meeting, the Vikings blitzed Fields on 71% of his drop backs(12 of 17), and they blitzed Bagent on 93% of his drop backs!!! So maybe Aikman was right.
I know someone mentioned that maybe Getsy doesn't trust Fields to throw the ball down the field...and that would be one of the dumbest things ever, and be just another of many indictments on Getsy. Fields has thrown 5 touchdowns and one interception with a passer rating of 112.5 on throws of 20+ air yards this season. CLEARLY the dude can throw it down the field.
I get the concept of screens against a blitz heavy team but you gotta play off that and push it deep to take advantage of the screens .. not just keep calling screens all game.
Troy Aikman was complaining that Vikes weren’t blitzing Fields enough. Throwing a dozen WR screens will discourage the opponents from blitzing. So it worked from that perspective, but it doesn’t score points.
Now let’s see whether the Bears learned anything and will open up the offense in the coming games. If they stick to what they have been doing, the darker theories come into play.
So according to ESPN the Vikings blitzed Fields on 52% of his drop backs. In comparison, in their first meeting, the Vikings blitzed Fields on 71% of his drop backs(12 of 17), and they blitzed Bagent on 93% of his drop backs!!! So maybe Aikman was right.
I know someone mentioned that maybe Getsy doesn't trust Fields to throw the ball down the field...and that would be one of the dumbest things ever, and be just another of many indictments on Getsy. Fields has thrown 5 touchdowns and one interception with a passer rating of 112.5 on throws of 20+ air yards this season. CLEARLY the dude can throw it down the field.
Another theory is that Getsy doesn’t trust Fields to handle the blitz, so run 18 WR screens to discourage blitzing. For one reason or another, Getsy/Flus figured this gave Bears best chance to win, OR …. Darker Theories.
I mean, you’d think by now they certainly understand Field’s strengths/weaknesses.
So according to ESPN the Vikings blitzed Fields on 52% of his drop backs. In comparison, in their first meeting, the Vikings blitzed Fields on 71% of his drop backs(12 of 17), and they blitzed Bagent on 93% of his drop backs!!! So maybe Aikman was right.
I know someone mentioned that maybe Getsy doesn't trust Fields to throw the ball down the field...and that would be one of the dumbest things ever, and be just another of many indictments on Getsy. Fields has thrown 5 touchdowns and one interception with a passer rating of 112.5 on throws of 20+ air yards this season. CLEARLY the dude can throw it down the field.
Another theory is that Getsy doesn’t trust Fields to handle the blitz, so run 18 WR screens to discourage blitzing. For one reason or another, Getsy/Flus figured this gave Bears best chance to win, OR …. Darker Theories.
I mean, you’d think by now they certainly understand Field’s strengths/weaknesses.
This is where I'm at. I think they don't trust him or know he won't throw the slant that would kill the blitz.
Another theory is that Getsy doesn’t trust Fields to handle the blitz, so run 18 WR screens to discourage blitzing. For one reason or another, Getsy/Flus figured this gave Bears best chance to win, OR …. Darker Theories.
I mean, you’d think by now they certainly understand Field’s strengths/weaknesses.
This is where I'm at. I think they don't trust him or know he won't throw the slant that would kill the blitz.
Flus himself has said many times that Field’s problem is making anticipation throws in rhythm with WRs. Yes, there are examples of him doing it, but not with enough consistency for them to feature those kinds of routes in the game plan. This is one of the reasons Josh Lucas says they will draft Williams (whom he compares to Mahomes).
This is where I'm at. I think they don't trust him or know he won't throw the slant that would kill the blitz.
Flus himself has said many times that Field’s problem is making anticipation throws in rhythm with WRs. Yes, there are examples of him doing it, but not with enough consistency for them to feature those kinds of routes in the game plan. This is one of the reasons Josh Lucas says they will draft Williams (whom he compares to Mahomes).
I watched the exact same vid. Yeah Lucas pointed put the juxtaposition of Fields' last throw (to Moore) and the play immediately before it.
One was a decisive, confident, absolute dart of a pass that was really impressive and won the game. The other was all the classic negative stuff we have become accustomed to with him--he looked lost, hesitant, indecisive, and had Scott wide open in the middle of the field but was so off-rhythm that he never made the throw.
It's really really hard to know what this guy's ceiling is when you see really good and really, really not-so-good just one snap apart like that.
He makes plays that look like top-5 QB material and also makes plays where he looks like nothing has changed in 2+ years (fumbles, holding ball forever, etc).
It is really frustrating and I wish Getsy would just take off the training wheels completely and let him sink or swim.
This is where I'm at. I think they don't trust him or know he won't throw the slant that would kill the blitz.
Flus himself has said many times that Field’s problem is making anticipation throws in rhythm with WRs. Yes, there are examples of him doing it, but not with enough consistency for them to feature those kinds of routes in the game plan. This is one of the reasons Josh Lucas says they will draft Williams (whom he compares to Mahomes).
But here is what does not add up. He did that in college and was extremely effective with those exact passes that the Getsy offense doesn't seem to incorporate so much. I don't buy that Fields can't make these throws. Don't take my word for it. You can see every single pass he threw at Ohio State. And this was against the best defenders in college football - guys who are in the NFL now. Bigtime schools on the biggest stages - big moments.
Here's just one blurb... but you can Google and find the stats.
LINK Fields substituted those free throws behind the line of scrimmage for standard quick game concepts from shotgun. In fact, Fields’ 21.73% target rate to the 6-10 yard area is higher than every 2020 QB, coming in about six percentage points higher than last year’s class average. Outs, curls, and slants — all of which are timing-based routes in the 6-10 yard area that want to be thrown right off the top of the drop back — are right in Fields’ wheelhouse as a sharp, accurate passer.
While being a high-volume passer to that area is not necessarily sexy, it’s encouraging to see an offense give freedom to their QB to throw those concepts instead of the easier, lower-ceiling screens and RPOs (run-pass options), especially when Fields’ target rates to every section beyond 10 yards is right around average. He was not really skimping out on tougher throws; he was just throwing fewer of the easiest concepts in the playbook.
Flus himself has said many times that Field’s problem is making anticipation throws in rhythm with WRs. Yes, there are examples of him doing it, but not with enough consistency for them to feature those kinds of routes in the game plan. This is one of the reasons Josh Lucas says they will draft Williams (whom he compares to Mahomes).
I watched the exact same vid. Yeah Lucas pointed put the juxtaposition of Fields' last throw (to Moore) and the play immediately before it.
One was a decisive, confident, absolute dart of a pass that was really impressive and won the game. The other was all the classic negative stuff we have become accustomed to with him--he looked lost, hesitant, indecisive, and had Scott wide open in the middle of the field but was so off-rhythm that he never made the throw.
It's really really hard to know what this guy's ceiling is when you see really good and really, really not-so-good just one snap apart like that.
He makes plays that look like top-5 QB material and also makes plays where he looks like nothing has changed in 2+ years (fumbles, holding ball forever, etc).
It is really frustrating and I wish Getsy would just take off the training wheels completely and let him sink or swim.
I think we’d see the same things just on a larger scale.
No matter what they do about Fields and assuming they don’t draft a tackle with the second pick, which would piss me off, I would want a defensive lineman. I can’t decide between Latu (DE who lead PAC-12 in sacks) or my guy Newton at 3-tech (who was just named Big-10 Defensive Player of the Year). What adds more to the Bears defense: a dominant DE on the outside or a dominant 3-tech on the inside? Selfishly, as an Illini fan, I want Newton.
This is where I'm at. I think they don't trust him or know he won't throw the slant that would kill the blitz.
Flus himself has said many times that Field’s problem is making anticipation throws in rhythm with WRs. Yes, there are examples of him doing it, but not with enough consistency for them to feature those kinds of routes in the game plan. This is one of the reasons Josh Lucas says they will draft Williams (whom he compares to Mahomes).
I'm not sure I buy that at all...but if I'm Poles I'm telling them to make him do it so that he has no doubt going into the off season one way or another, and I'd add in that if they keep this shit up I'm getting rid of everyone...them included.
Flus himself has said many times that Field’s problem is making anticipation throws in rhythm with WRs. Yes, there are examples of him doing it, but not with enough consistency for them to feature those kinds of routes in the game plan. This is one of the reasons Josh Lucas says they will draft Williams (whom he compares to Mahomes).
I'm not sure I buy that at all...but if I'm Poles I'm telling them to make him do it so that he has no doubt going into the off season one way or another, and I'd add in that if they keep this shit up I'm getting rid of everyone...them included.