They seem to think that with Trevon Diggs' ACL injury, Dallas might target JJ.
LINK Cowboys Trade Rumor: No. 1 Target is Jaylon Johnson; Would Chicago Bears Send CB to Dallas? The Dallas Cowboys are a popular pick to trade for a cornerback at the deadline, and a deal proposed by NFL.com would address that need. But would the Bears send Jaylon Johnson away?
If we trade Jaylon /or we dont sign an extension with him... im gonna be on the Fire Poles wagon
If it were anybody but Poles, I wouldn’t be worried. But if JJ drives a hard bargain in their contract negotiations, I can see Poles shipping him out like Roquan for a stinking second round draft pick.
If we trade Jaylon /or we dont sign an extension with him... im gonna be on the Fire Poles wagon
If it were anybody but Poles, I wouldn’t be worried. But if JJ drives a hard bargain in their contract negotiations, I can see Poles shipping him out like Roquan for a stinking second round draft pick.
Yeah, couple key differences here.
Roq made it clear he wanted to "reset the market" and be the highest-paid at his position. If you recall, a knock on him was the very same as the one on JJ -- he didn't force as many turnovers as other "elite" players did.
JJ isn't talking like that. He wants to be well paid for sure but he isn't claiming to be the top CB in the league or asking for market re-setting money.
Roq was also a bit of a PITA off the field. He lost his playbook. He got caught partying with pornstars in public during Covid lockdowns. He held out (or "held in") TWICE. He refused to hire an agent. Then he went out of his way to throw shade at Family Fest by publicly saying the Bears weren't negotiating "in good faith" with him.
JJ has been a good soldier and not an off-field embarrassment.
Finally, Roq plays ILB; JJ plays CB. CB >> ILB in terms of impact. If you're gonna pay an ILB $20+M/yr, he better be taking the ball away a lot. It's simply a less premium position on defense.
IMO, unless JJ is quietly demanding ridiculous money, he's a no-brainer to re-sign. We aren't tearing down this year. We are rebuilding and he's a solid B+ starter at a key position who is only 24 yo.
Having Jaylon in Chicago, for the next 4y is a must imo. We cannot be letting go of all of our draftees, especially not the best ones, and Jaylon is on the very top imo. In fact, he is the best on the D side. If Kmet got his extension (and I like that dude, although he is super slow, he has been getting better in blocking and loves Da Bears), then Jaylon NEEDS to get his too.
If it were anybody but Poles, I wouldn’t be worried. But if JJ drives a hard bargain in their contract negotiations, I can see Poles shipping him out like Roquan for a stinking second round draft pick.
Yeah, couple key differences here.
Roq made it clear he wanted to "reset the market" and be the highest-paid at his position. If you recall, a knock on him was the very same as the one on JJ -- he didn't force as many turnovers as other "elite" players did.
JJ isn't talking like that. He wants to be well paid for sure but he isn't claiming to be the top CB in the league or asking for market re-setting money.
Roq was also a bit of a PITA off the field. He lost his playbook. He got caught partying with pornstars in public during Covid lockdowns. He held out (or "held in") TWICE. He refused to hire an agent. Then he went out of his way to throw shade at Family Fest by publicly saying the Bears weren't negotiating "in good faith" with him.
JJ has been a good soldier and not an off-field embarrassment.
Finally, Roq plays ILB; JJ plays CB. CB >> ILB in terms of impact. If you're gonna pay an ILB $20+M/yr, he better be taking the ball away a lot. It's simply a less premium position on defense.
IMO, unless JJ is quietly demanding ridiculous money, he's a no-brainer to re-sign. We aren't tearing down this year. We are rebuilding and he's a solid B+ starter at a key position who is only 24 yo.
Ravens paid what he wanted, and Poles stuck on his own number which was less than market was willing to pay. I worry about that scenario repeating. And it doesn’t require JJ asking for a ridiculous salary — only what Poles is unwilling to pay and some other GM (Cowboys?) will pay.
Roq made it clear he wanted to "reset the market" and be the highest-paid at his position. If you recall, a knock on him was the very same as the one on JJ -- he didn't force as many turnovers as other "elite" players did.
JJ isn't talking like that. He wants to be well paid for sure but he isn't claiming to be the top CB in the league or asking for market re-setting money.
Roq was also a bit of a PITA off the field. He lost his playbook. He got caught partying with pornstars in public during Covid lockdowns. He held out (or "held in") TWICE. He refused to hire an agent. Then he went out of his way to throw shade at Family Fest by publicly saying the Bears weren't negotiating "in good faith" with him.
JJ has been a good soldier and not an off-field embarrassment.
Finally, Roq plays ILB; JJ plays CB. CB >> ILB in terms of impact. If you're gonna pay an ILB $20+M/yr, he better be taking the ball away a lot. It's simply a less premium position on defense.
IMO, unless JJ is quietly demanding ridiculous money, he's a no-brainer to re-sign. We aren't tearing down this year. We are rebuilding and he's a solid B+ starter at a key position who is only 24 yo.
Ravens paid what he wanted, and Poles stuck on his own number which was less than market was willing to pay. I worry about that scenario repeating. And it doesn’t require JJ asking for a ridiculous salary — only what Poles is unwilling to pay and some other GM (Cowboys?) will pay.
Put another way:
Poles wasn't willing to pay market-resetting money to an off-ball LB who didn't cause many turnovers.