I have no doubt that this is correct b/c the Bears have yet again had to bring in an "outside source" to evaluate what the hell is going on.
sigh #1 problem w/the Mc's, after being involved in the NFL for 30+ years they still don't have a blasted clue wtsf is going on or how to run a pro football team. It's not about cheap, or not, it's not about loyalty or whatever, it's their complete inability to learn ANYTHING about the very industry they have been a part of. Jerry Jone's kid has had a fraction of the time to figure it out, and is already better then his dad at it. Wonder if the paid for the Mc's "outside source" is willing to tell them that they are the problem; as well as their hand picked financial accountant.
Pace has had his issues, #1 was only having 1 option in his mind at qb. It was Marriotta 2 years ago, or Wentz this year(2 great choices btw) but the fact that there were no other options in his eyes has really put this team back; Barkley is a joke, and while Hoyer did better then one could expect, he's no long or short term answer. There were other options in the last 2 classes that could be backing up this team right now.
I warned everyone at the time(didn't need the media to tell me) that Fox's 2 year thing was a myth, it's why he's a .500 coach, and why Elway tossed him. Healthy or not, this team was barely .500, w/no health at all(now along the OL serious fractures) they'll be lucky to win 5 games even w/a soft as butter schedule.
I know that this isn't a popular view but I honestly don't think the Bears should move on from Cutler until they have a solid replacement ready to takeover - and I don't think Hoyer is that. Cutler is a starting NFL calibre quarterback and there aren't enough of those to go round. Bears could be doing a lot worse. I do hope they draft someone this year - but I'd still want Cutler around so whoever is drafted has to win the place and so we know we are getting a genuine improvement.
He is paid about in line with his ability and the only way I think they should get a rid of him is if there is another team with a big need at quarterback but otherwise a good roster so we might get a decent pick back in trade. The only teams I can think of are the the Broncos and may be the Rams.
Having said all that, getting rid of talented players with no back up plan is basically Pace's modus operandi so maybe you are all right
Right now Cutler is a below average QB, so they could also do a lot better. Sadly Hoyer isn't that much worse then he is; if only b/c he's willing to play w/in the O system he's given. There is a reason the last 2 HC's have wanted to move on from him. Cutler is being pushed down the starting caliber chart every year by new younger, cheaper, more raw, more high ceiling talent.
If people had just looked at how the personnal changed from year one to year two of Fox's other teams, the 'Fox Bounce' would have been revealed as a media myth. The media built up Fox into this HC Superstar when he was just a beneficiary of injections of elite personnal.
Now it's ironic that the local media who loved Fox last year is slowly turning on him, and dragging the fan base along with them.
As far as Cutler....don't know what to say at this point. He's gone after this season. He knows it, Pace knows it, Fox knows it, everyone knows it. No way anyone is trading for him at this point. If he really wants piss off Pace and Fox he should go 5-3 down the stretch and ruin their draft position. Knowing the Bears luck, it will happen.
That could well be true but I'm not convinced that it will be Cutler who goes. That only happens if Fox remains and if that isn't what's being hashed out by the "top brass" as Rapoport says then I'd have to wonder why it isn't.
Jay Cutler may never win a SB for the Bears and his star may be fading but they sure as hell won't win one with John Fox running the team either. All of the gains Adam Gase was able to bring about with that offense last year have been completely destroyed in less than half a season by John Fox.
He won in Denver because he had OCs like Mike McCoy and Adam Gase and a QB like Payton Manning. Without two top OCs to run his offense it's cratered and no one should ever expect Jay Cutler to be Payton Manning because no one else has been either. That still doesn't make Cutler a poorer choice than Brian Hoyer yet Fox would more than likely have continued to start him over Cutler even after Cutler returned.
So.....how can anyone honestly say we should stick it out with a HC who saw Jeremy Langford as a better option than Carey and Howard at RB, saw Kevin White as a better option than Cam Meredith at WR, played rookie Leonard Floyd as a 3 down OLB from day one keeping his best all around OLB and pass rusher on the bench, and insisted on replacing Robbie Gould with the far more accurate Connor Barth (which was a lie) until he very quickly proved he wasn't.
So if this is the guy you want trying to resurrect your team well then you're welcome to him but I will not support him period. I'm done with "the man without a plan" for good and I can only hope those who actually do control his fate see it the same way.
Fox isn't the only one that is done w/Cutler in Chicago though. Pace hasn't wanted him the last 2 years and tried to trade him, or trade up to get the new QB. Cutler likely isn't here if not for that awful Emery contract that just F'd the Bears completely; there was no way to get rid of him after that.
No, I agree, you don't get rid of a guy unless there is somebody better to replace him. Or if there is a serious problem with the guy. How does Cutler fit with this mantra? We don't have anybody better, but is there a serious problem, enough to just dump him? I'm not completely sure there is, but it's not cut and dried either.
I think the serious problem may well be Fox and his schizoid ways of dealing with his personnel issues. It appears to me that he totally over estimates the talent levels and abilities of certain players and to claim in a presser that he sees progress when nearly everyone else sees a team falling farther and farther behind each week is beyond mystifying to me. It sound crazy.
When he was asked for the very first time about Cutler's status once he was cleared to play all he had to say is ask me again when that day comes. Or he could have simply said injured starters return as starters and that would have ended any and all of this shit that's been going on ever since Hoyer came into play.
He could have made it a non-issue but he chose not to. So was that his way of sending some kind of message he really didn't need to send. Those first two losses weren't on Jay. As much as anything they were on Fox for not having his team ready to play and for having no idea of how to make any in game adjustments to counter the others guys adjustments. Fox's reputation as a very poor game day coach proceeds him and he's done nothing to dispel that.
So if there is a problem then as I see it it's one of Fox's own creation and it doesn't look all that dissimilar to the way Trestman looked to scapegoat Cutler when his ass was on the hot seat. The main difference is Fox is more arrogant and has a much bigger ego to deal with. I honestly do believe that it's gonna come down to one or the other because if I'm reading Jay right he's done with Fox as well and doesn't want to play for him again.
That could well be true but I'm not convinced that it will be Cutler who goes. That only happens if Fox remains and if that isn't what's being hashed out by the "top brass" as Rapoport says then I'd have to wonder why it isn't.
Jay Cutler may never win a SB for the Bears and his star may be fading but they sure as hell won't win one with John Fox running the team either. All of the gains Adam Gase was able to bring about with that offense last year have been completely destroyed in less than half a season by John Fox.
He won in Denver because he had OCs like Mike McCoy and Adam Gase and a QB like Payton Manning. Without two top OCs to run his offense it's cratered and no one should ever expect Jay Cutler to be Payton Manning because no one else has been either. That still doesn't make Cutler a poorer choice than Brian Hoyer yet Fox would more than likely have continued to start him over Cutler even after Cutler returned.
So.....how can anyone honestly say we should stick it out with a HC who saw Jeremy Langford as a better option than Carey and Howard at RB, saw Kevin White as a better option than Cam Meredith at WR, played rookie Leonard Floyd as a 3 down OLB from day one keeping his best all around OLB and pass rusher on the bench, and insisted on replacing Robbie Gould with the far more accurate Connor Barth (which was a lie) until he very quickly proved he wasn't.
So if this is the guy you want trying to resurrect your team well then you're welcome to him but I will not support him period. I'm done with "the man without a plan" for good and I can only hope those who actually do control his fate see it the same way.
Fox isn't the only one that is done w/Cutler in Chicago though. Pace hasn't wanted him the last 2 years and tried to trade him, or trade up to get the new QB. Cutler likely isn't here if not for that awful Emery contract that just F'd the Bears completely; there was no way to get rid of him after that.
That's never been proven and we both know that. The only rumor ever floated was a trade with the Titans and both sides have denied it ever reached any stage of being serious. Tennessee wasn't about to forego Mariotta and his rookie contract for Cutlers.
So lets not go there unless you can document it and you can't. That was another of those Ian Rapoport rumors that has since been proven false.
And if it even was the case then why did both Fox and Pace give him their full vote of confidence to Cutler after last season and say that he was the QB they would continue to build around and that is a documented fact.
I'll even go you one more that proves what your claim makes no sense. IF that was the case then tell me why Pace and Fox would ever have passed on drafting a QB for two straight years especially when they passed on Dak Prescott to draft defensive depth and STeam players in round four.
There is not one iota of evidence that says once both of them accepted the fact that they could win with Cutler shortly after they arrived and evaluated the roster that they have ever made any honest attempt to trade him and they sure as hell haven't spent any draft capital on his replacement either have they?
I don't know that it hasn't been proven. No one is going to admit to a potential trade they decided not to do. But per usual where there is smoke there is fire.
And what did you have w/the last 2 HC's. 2 guys that benched Cutler for far lesser talent; why for the same issue he's always had, refusal to run the system. No doubt a HC/OC would tire of that quickly.
You know full well and good you back your players until they are no longer there. Pace failed that why they passed on qb's. Paced opted for an all or nothing; top qb prospect or none at all approach, which is a poor way of doing it.
You've always rejected reality when it came to Cutler so continue to do it; I'm fine w/that.
I know that this isn't a popular view but I honestly don't think the Bears should move on from Cutler until they have a solid replacement ready to takeover - and I don't think Hoyer is that. Cutler is a starting NFL calibre quarterback and there aren't enough of those to go round. Bears could be doing a lot worse. I do hope they draft someone this year - but I'd still want Cutler around so whoever is drafted has to win the place and so we know we are getting a genuine improvement.
He is paid about in line with his ability and the only way I think they should get a rid of him is if there is another team with a big need at quarterback but otherwise a good roster so we might get a decent pick back in trade. The only teams I can think of are the the Broncos and may be the Rams.
Having said all that, getting rid of talented players with no back up plan is basically Pace's modus operandi so maybe you are all right.We hsa
I know that this isn't a popular view but I honestly don't think the Bears should move on from Cutler until they have a solid replacement ready to takeover - and I don't think Hoyer is that. Cutler is a starting NFL calibre quarterback and there aren't enough of those to go round. Bears could be doing a lot worse. I do hope they draft someone this year - but I'd still want Cutler around so whoever is drafted has to win the place and so we know we are getting a genuine improvement.
He is paid about in line with his ability and the only way I think they should get a rid of him is if there is another team with a big need at quarterback but otherwise a good roster so we might get a decent pick back in trade. The only teams I can think of are the the Broncos and may be the Rams.
Having said all that, getting rid of talented players with no back up plan is basically Pace's modus operandi so maybe you are all right
Right now Cutler is a below average QB, so they could also do a lot better. Sadly Hoyer isn't that much worse then he is; if only b/c he's willing to play w/in the O system he's given. There is a reason the last 2 HC's have wanted to move on from him. Cutler is being pushed down the starting caliber chart every year by new younger, cheaper, more raw, more high ceiling talent.
Now this is really pathetic because just a few weeks ago you were posting about how bad Hoyer was when others actually felt he may have been at the very least another Josh McCown. Well he proved to be about as far from that as I am from being the next BB King.
Play within what system? You mean the one that looks like we were playing CPD flag football. The one that couldn't score more than 23 points in any one game and averaged less than 17 per game. You aren't gonna win many games that way in the NFL. Hoyer avoided picks because he never took any risk at all. When asked to push the ball down the field against two shitty defenses to give us a shot at winning two winnable games he couldn't even do that.
If you want to call that a system then all it is is a system of playing not to lose and whoever plays it does lose more often than not as just as we did. How well was Hoyer doing in the GB game before he got hurt. By then a decent team with a decent defense an a smarter DC had him all figured out and took away his favorite throws so he was dead in the water gain an so was the offense. Hoyer did diddly squat and Barkley did little more. We scored 3 offensive points in the whole game!
Come on Ric wake up and get real here. Few others see it any different that this either.
"Right now Cutler is a below average QB"
LMAO, what??? You come to this conclusion on the basis of 1 1/2 games and playing hurt in the second one? He had no blocking and no running game and yet he and AJ were the only real offense we had. You truly do deserve QBs like Hoyer because you couldn't spot a half way decent one of he kicked you in the nuts.
When Cutler actually had a system built around his strengths by an OC who knew what the **** he was doing he had one of his best years performance wise and won at least two games coming from behind pretty much on his own. How well did Hoyer do when given the same shot against two supposedly weaker teams?
Gase leaves forcing Fox into a position he can't handle which is to lend offensive support, he turns the offense over to an inexperienced OC and play caller who tries to accommodate Fox's neutered approach to offensive football and the entire offense sinks to the bottom like a lead weight. And with all of this you still think this is all on Cutler and his 6 quarters of football played this year!!! That's an amazing conclusion based again on total ignorance of the facts.
Then let's finish with his last two HCs have wanted to move on from him. You mean the one who just got his passport punched back to Canada for messing up Joe Flacco and Baltimore's offense too. And his current one who drafted Jimmy Clausen as his starter prompting his dismissal as the Panthers HC? Oh yeah, Fox is a real prime evaluator of choice QB talent he is. The two of you should run the 2017 draft and find your next QB.
I haven't changed on Hoyer, he's terrible, but he's not a huge downgrade from Cutler now is he? Both are bottom 1/3rd to 1/4 qb's in the league. Cutler is no lnoger a top 1/2 QB.
System looked pretty good w/McCown and Hoyer playing in them(talking about the last 3 now). It only looked bad w/Cutler in it.
OL looked pretty good when the QB got rid of the ball quickly. It's old, but there was another thread I showed that Cutler's average time of release was under 3 sec's, but his average time holding onto a ball when sacked was over 4 sec's. I have no doubt that has changed. Hoyer rarely if ever held onto the ball long so the OL never was put in a position to fail by the QB.
Cutler's best seasons are still not that good, and they are few and far between. According to everyone here, Loggains was the only option b/c it would be the same system as last year, "Their system". So now Loggains is the problem, and not Cutler no longer following the script(which is usual for his 2nd year in a system).
As opposed to the ones that wanted him; name those HC's? I'll wait why you try and find that answer b/c there is 1, the guy that drafted him who sucked after Denver fired him. Lovie, maybe but he's so bad he's down in college now and failing there. Name the winning coaches that wanted Cutler; they don't exist.
I don't know that it hasn't been proven. No one is going to admit to a potential trade they decided not to do. But per usual where there is smoke there is fire.
And what did you have w/the last 2 HC's. 2 guys that benched Cutler for far lesser talent; why for the same issue he's always had, refusal to run the system. No doubt a HC/OC would tire of that quickly.
You know full well and good you back your players until they are no longer there. Pace failed that why they passed on qb's. Paced opted for an all or nothing; top qb prospect or none at all approach, which is a poor way of doing it.
You've always rejected reality when it came to Cutler so continue to do it; I'm fine w/that.
It has been proven. I told you that and the lack of any logic behind a trade for Cutler when the Titans were lined up on Mariotta proves it. There's only fire if you're the one with the matches or you choose to believe all the pre-draft hoo haa ESPN and the NFL Network have to churn out to keep viewer interest high.
Cutler has never refused to run a system even when Martz nearly got him killed with his.
And what two HCs benched him? Trestman benched him for one game in his dying attempts to keep his job and it was a miserable failure. Fox has never benched him.....yet, and now he can't. Come on Ric stick to facts. You aren't doing that here.
So you know exactly why Pace did what he did huh? I didn't realize you two were so close. What all or nothing approach? He could have traded back in round one and taken Lynch. Two or three more QBs went in rounds two and three and Prescott who even I though would make an ideal understudy to Cutler and for the kind of offense I envisioned the Bears running they passed on. So did he fail or was it simply because he and Fox had expressed their joint satisfaction with the progress Cutler had made last year and therefore QB was a lesser priority than other positions?
If you won't follow the logic trail of that then there's nothing more can say that you'd grasp either. None of your scenarios makes any sense and you're substituting fiction for fact trying to support your position even when you know that will never work with me.
The reality is Cutler is the best QB on this team and if you can even find 1% of knowledgeable football fans who would say differently I would be shocked. You've even turned your recent opinions of Hoyer around to suit your argument here and we can go back and look those up if you like.
Cutler is an above average passer with a bad habit of forcing throws to make plays because in order to win too many times it was the only choice he had. Put him on a better team and he'll win more games than he loses just as he did before the wheels fell off this team about 4 or 5 years ago. On any given week he's as good as a Joe Flacco or an Eli Manning, a Philip Rivers, or a Matt Ryan and a Matthew Stafford who have all had their own issues winning behind crappy team as well.
For Cutlers sake and for the sake of all the whiny ass fans who've forgotten how much worse it was before we even had a QB as "average" as Cutler is supposed to be I really do hope he's traded to a better team and then we'll all watch the Bears go through yet another decade of trying to find that magical franchise QB we never seem able to draft.