Bears beat Titans - who gets the game ball?

Jonathon Wood from dabearsblog posted a little breakdown of snap counts (I posted it in the Bears-Titans Tweeter thread). He said there was something funny about the rotations on OFF. Everett outsnapped Kmet*, which should never happen. Out of the Moore/Allen/Rome/Kmet/Swift/Herbert group, these guys were only on the field together for like 8 snaps. This means that Waldron was playing 2nd and 3rd stringers way too much for Williams first game. I don't know if the rotation got away from him** or if he was trying to be the smartest guy in the room. MLewis should have played more if the OL was struggling to block as well. I always get concerned when the Bears are trying to throw TDs to Everett and Carter in close games rather than Kmet and Moore/Allen. Herbert also got very few carries, I think Homer out carried him.
------
* Some idiot on windycity said its because Everett is a better blocker than Kmet. He was promptly laughed off the site.

** I still don't know how rotations work in the NFL. For example: Is Moore out there until he gets tired and then he takes himself out for a break? Or is it more like Moore runs 5 plays and then subs out for 2 plays, etc. Are the playcalls determining the rotation? (For example, when Waldron called XYZ-27-flat-left does that mean Carter and Everett come in because they are the predetermined targets for that play?) Does Waldron even know who is being rotated off at any given instance? (Does he call RRT-XFlat-TE-Power because he likes that play in that location and then he looks up and Williams is throwing a slant to MLewis?)

Hoge said that the Bears view Everett as the better receiving option over Kmet, who they see as the better blocker. If that is the case then the question has to be asked, why was Everett in more b/c the OL needed all the help the Bears could offer. Should have seen nothing but 2 TE sets after the first couple drives. Chase Daniels breakdown said the same thing as JTO, it wasn't a scheme problem it was a talent deficit that created issues. I'm guessing that's a nice way of saying the Bears IOL was absolute Trash, the OT's were bad and the RB's/WR's/TE's chip blocking were sub par.

Valid questions, but his point is the plays are there if people do their jobs, they didn't. Tackle, G, C, G, Tackle and anyone asked to chip were constantly beat, if not flat blown up. OL were tripping over themselves and one OT tripped over a WR running a sweep. 

Question is, are any of the IOL capable of doing their jobs. We know Wright and Braxton are at least passable, and Jenkins when healthy is a + player. But C/RG are a giant question that could tank the entire OL b/c of their inability to play pro ball.
If the OL is struggling this much, can you afford to have Everett as a receiving TE out there more then, or even equal to Kmet/Lewis? Again imo(I'm not qualified nor able to do anything) you run a lot of 2 TE sets w/Kmet/Lewis and/or 1 of them and Everett to help the OL early on to allow your young qb time to adjust and get comfortable to the game.


And I'm still pissed that Poles has just constantly kicked the OL can down the line while fixing WR's and DB's as if they matter more then the fucking thing that protects the qb. WR talent doesn't mean spit if the QB cannot get the ball out b/c their is constantly a def, or 6 in his face(literally). Could Williams clean up some happy feet and get the ball out sooner, yes. But he's also a rookie and asking him to get the ball out as fast as future HoF'rs and all pro's is a big ask. The OL has to do their job at least badly and not look like a bunch of future Canadian leaguers that shouldn't be on an NFL roster.

*side note* on one of the many chgo shows they had a bunch of former Bears. One was on the Saints for awhile w/Brees. And he said w/those shorter qb's, you need big ass tanks on the interior to help hold the pocket for the QB to find the passing lane and step into it. The current bears IOL are not tanks, they are broken down smart cars; small flacid, inept, unusable. This is no way to protect a young qb, let alone one that isn't an ideal qb height. 

The Monday Morning QBs are coming out saying Poles should have not drafted Rome and instead went OL or OL after a trade-down.  Way too soon to tell and I get why they went WR.  RO was clear bpa on the board at #9 and we have sucked at WR for a long, long time too.

I do think it's fair to say that Poles could have been more aggressive in FA in securing a higher quality starting C than Shelton.  Think they had Bates mentally penciled in there but Nate Davis continuing to be unreliable at RG has thrown that plan out the window.