If that is the case then sure trade them. But you will still need a S and CB to fill those roster slots. I'm not arguing for keeping them, all I'm saying is that we did the tear down, Johnson is young and worth keeping. Why create two holes? And if our argument for keeping Hicks is that he's playing but (by your admissions) "not well" at playing safety I'd rather keep BoJack as a vet in that young secondary.
Trade um, don't trade um it won't matter by the time a new QB is up and running. But if Jackson and Johnson are let go I'm willing to wager that the Bears draft a CB and a S by by the time the third round is over.
Eh, I still disagree. There is always free agency, the market looks saturated with upgrades from Hicks that won't cost a lot.
And, again, Bears already loaded up on CB in preparation to let go of JJ. This is where you can spend another later pick - like Terell Smith, veteran depth player via FA, or rock with Greg Stroman, Jaylon Jones, or Josh Blackwell.
Nothing suggest we have to spend high draft capital to replace with JJ or BoJack. I mean, if BPA falls that was, it's a different story.
Yeah, I disagree, but doesn't matter in the end. It will all depend on how jogs out to take the first snaps next season and what HC/OC is calling the plays.
That's what is so deflating and why this message board has gone radio silent. We are all shellshocked at seeing what has transpired this season.
I never would have guessed 2 months ago that Fields would fall flat this bad and the offense would still look this bad.
The defense held the Vikings to only 220 yards of offense on Sunday and the O still couldn't win the game. Biggs published this: the Bears are 1-4 in the last 5 games they held the opposing offense to 220 yards or less.
That's truly hard to do. Its actually difficult to have an NFL offense this bad.
It's literally the worst in the NFL in a variety of categories. I don't think I've ever seen a franchise this storied shine so brightly for it's level of ineptitude.
What frustrates me the most about the chronic failures of the Bears franchise regarding building a good offense - is that they have not done the most basic things needed for success on offense. It begins with the offensive line but obviously doesn't end there.
It is not that difficult to build a solid offensive line. Certainly it is easier to do than to draft a great franchise QB. Right? Interior OL are not difficult to find in the draft or FA. Tackles are harder, but still not THAT tough to find. You may whiff on a tackle but just go right back and try again if you do. And you probably are not going to build anything special with late round draft picks. You have to invest high-level resources (draft or FA) in your tackles. But again, that is so doable. Bears have not built the OL. That frustrates me.
The skill positions are not that difficult to find also. Not easy, but it's not like finding unicorns. But yes, you do need to invest top-level draft/FA resources if you expect to get top-level skill talent on offense. The Bears have invested some high level draft picks, but they need to do more if they expect more of a ROI with these players. D.J. Moore is a nice addition. Kmet is a good TE. But the team needs more than those two - and the WR & OL unit should have been built before Fields was even drafted. Before. People can argue that point, but I'm just saying don't expect the O woes to go away without better WR and OL talent in place - just "drafting another kid" at QB won't solve our problems if the infrastructure is not there on offense to maximize the odds of the young kid succeeding.
There is nothing "new" to this. It (to me anyway) is NFL 101 stuff. Invest in top level talent on offense if you expect top level results on offense. If you whiff on a WR or OL, don't give up... pony up another pick and keep trying, until you get it done. If the GM is incapable of getting it done, then yes, you need to replace him.