Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2016 15:00:45 GMT -6
Aug 28, 2016 14:06:56 GMT -6 @bearsinhouston said:
I am far from sure it's Cutler. Far from sure. Not even sure how big a part he may play. It's more about the QB kind of throwing a halo effect on the offense in general. So how much of that is true? How much does a QB really affect the play and attitude of the whole offense? I'd be lying if I said I knew. Just stuff going through my mind as he is the only moving part that has not been changed out and the results are the same. Just not even sure it means anything. All I know that it looks like we might be seeing more of the same and what a waste.... How often do you get a schedule like this?Cutler is the best QB the Bears have had, statistically.
Yes, he has a pouty face, and reporters don't like him. So?
We've all discussed the issues with crappy OCs, crappy O Lines, crappy receivers.
Ditto for interceptions.
But the guy cares. He wants to win and sacrifices himself, sometimes when he shouldn't.
You know what I keep coming back to? Who was a QB we used to win with? A QB who wasn't really accurate, or really all that skilled. Heck, he only had good vision in one eye. No more hints, we all know the punky QB was a winner.
The question is, what did he have that Cutler doesn't? He made the guys around him better. He got it done. I'm more of the opinion this year than before, that whatever that X factor is, that McMahon had, Cutler doesn't. For that missing X factor, and for the good of all, we need to get Cutler's replacement lined up. The sooner the better.
Unfortunaltely, the thought that we had pretty much fixed the team over the last two years just got beaten down and smashed to smithereens. We still need a lot of work in FA and the draft next year. But we also can no longer afford to ignore the QB position either.
So after all that, all I have to say is it has to be the X factor. Now could somebody please tell us what that X factor is?
It is the factor that sits between the W and Y factors.