I'm a little confused by what Poles is doing with the Edmunds signing. So much for the idea that he "doesn't spend on off-ball LBs".
Edmunds is an excellent player and I wanted him in the draft years ago but not sure I would have spent big bucks on him.
Are we planning on running a 0-3 defense? Cuz we have 3 good LBs but 0 starting caliber DLs. ZERO
My best guess that Poles has names and maxx prices next to it. and it seems that (esp) RTs are getting too high. We have a very late 2nd rounder and im not sure we can get a decent RT over there, maybe yes... DE we need to get with no.9
I'm a little confused by what Poles is doing with the Edmunds signing. So much for the idea that he "doesn't spend on off-ball LBs".
Edmunds is an excellent player and I wanted him in the draft years ago but not sure I would have spent big bucks on him.
Are we planning on running a 0-3 defense? Cuz we have 3 good LBs but 0 starting caliber DLs. ZERO
My best guess that Poles has names and maxx prices next to it. and it seems that (esp) RTs are getting too high. We have a very late 2nd rounder and im not sure we can get a decent RT over there, maybe yes... DE we need to get with no.9
That's a ballsy strategy to just assume the players you like will fall perfectly to you on the board.
My best guess that Poles has names and maxx prices next to it. and it seems that (esp) RTs are getting too high. We have a very late 2nd rounder and im not sure we can get a decent RT over there, maybe yes... DE we need to get with no.9
That's a ballsy strategy to just assume the players you like will fall perfectly to you on the board.
Sure is. But it would also be crazy to overpay (by his opinion) when u are so far away and need to fill many holes + important extensions.
My best guess that Poles has names and maxx prices next to it. and it seems that (esp) RTs are getting too high. We have a very late 2nd rounder and im not sure we can get a decent RT over there, maybe yes... DE we need to get with no.9
That's a ballsy strategy to just assume the players you like will fall perfectly to you on the board.
I'd rather take a chance that I can find a RT in the draft than pay what the RTs got today. I'm not trying to be flippant. There were some huge contracts thrown at these RTs.
I'm a little confused by what Poles is doing with the Edmunds signing. So much for the idea that he "doesn't spend on off-ball LBs".
Edmunds is an excellent player and I wanted him in the draft years ago but not sure I would have spent big bucks on him.
Are we planning on running a 0-3 defense? Cuz we have 3 good LBs but 0 starting caliber DLs. ZERO
If his numbers are right, that for $4m AAV more, Poles signed Edmunds AND Edwards AND got a 2nd round pick.
I understand it compared to paying Roquan. I don't understand it in terms of paying that much for the position.
Love Edmunds. The guy is a total stud and young. I'm just really surprised they're prioritizing off-ball LB as heavily as they are right now.
I gotta see the whole plan unfold first here to understand what they are thinking here. We just spend a good chunk of our available space on what many would consider a lower impact position group.