Just so everyone is on the same page, the Cowboys finished 9th in rushing yards but tied for 21st in rushing TDs last year. They had a pretty good year rushing actually but that had a lot to do with having the 27th ranked passing offense.
This has always been one of my favorite loop holes in motm's theories. He loves to talk about how Pace doesn't know how to make good first round picks yet he keeps demanding that the Bears must suck in order to get a higher first round pick. If you have zero faith in Pace's ability to draft in the first round then why would anyone think he couldn't screw up a top 3 pick?
The higher you are in the first round the better chance you have to hit on a stud.
What is not hard to understand?
I do understand that and have already posted that. For some reason you keep saying Pace can't pick good players in the first round so I don't see why you care so much. I would assume you just expect him to draft bigger bust.
Luke Kuechly Von Miller Cam Newton Andrew Luck Patrick Peterson Julio Jones Ndamukong Suh Joe Haden Gerald McCoy Aldon Smith Ezekiel Ansah Khalil Mack Anthony Barr
....
Justin Gilbert Eric Ebron Dion Jordan Dee Milliner Trent Richardson Justin Blackmon Ryan Tannehill Jake Locker Blaine Gabbert Sam Bradford CJ Spiller Mark Sanchez Vernon Gholston--remember him? The Can't Miss DEF Elite Playmaker? JaMarkus Russell Gaines Adams Vince Young
Anyone can cherry pick a list. You are also on record as saying Pace can't draft in the first round. In your posted opinion Pace is more likely than not to end up with a guy from list #2.
Are they not top 10 draft picks which is were the better players, the playmakers are found? Aren't they exactly the players teams should have been drafting? Top of the draft highly rated prospects? Didn't you just in another thread argue that without a QB a team has nothing?
This has always been one of my favorite loop holes in motm's theories. He loves to talk about how Pace doesn't know how to make good first round picks yet he keeps demanding that the Bears must suck in order to get a higher first round pick. If you have zero faith in Pace's ability to draft in the first round then why would anyone think he couldn't screw up a top 3 pick?
The higher you are in the first round the better chance you have to hit on a stud.
What is not hard to understand?
No one is doubting that. Not a single person here. High picks produce better players, we had this same argument on the other board over QBs and you denied the same thing you are posting now. Yet, even though you are saying this now, here is a list of positions you have advocated don't need to be drafted in the first round:
QB RB WR G C TE non-pass rushing DL ILB as opposed to pass rushing OLB
What some of us are having a hard time with are the contradictions in your arguments:
Better players, HOF players, play-makers need to be drafted early, you just said that. Except that doesn't apply to QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, C, and Gs ( I may be leaving a position out, can't remember.) You say Cooper would have been a better pick than White (which no one is arguing) but you also say never draft a WR in the first. Bosa is 'better' than Floyd, yet you labeled Bosa a bust before the draft had even started and would never have taken him. Then you have listed EE as a playmaker yet consider drafting him a bad choice. Your entire draft strategy was Buckner or trade down. So which is it? And even though Buckner is having a solid year how come you never mention him?
You aren't totally wrong in your positions, its just that you take such a hard line and then bob and weave when the discussion starts. I always read your threads because the better discussions are in them.
I am going on record right now as saying that for recent times, Pace has picked better than the other GMs we have had. Has he taken guys with potential rather than immediate starting ability? yes. Has he not been able to identify really good players taken later in the draft that we could have picked? yes.
But he also has done better than Angelo and Emery. Could we do better than Pace? probably yes, but right now I think he is still growing and he is at least competent. I'm ok with him. However, I am not ok with some of the player decisions recently. What I don;t know is if it was Pace or Fox or maybe even both.
Elliott isn't as huge of a playmaker as many on here think. He's a product of that Oline. Even PFF agrees with that.
The only player you listed that is a true stud was Aaron Donald. You don't find that every day. Von Miller isn't there. A Luke Kuechly isn't there. A Patrick Peterson isn't there...
I can keep going on. The point is franchises need playmakers. Your best shot to get studs are in the top 10.
Luke Kuechly Von Miller Cam Newton Andrew Luck Patrick Peterson Julio Jones Ndamukong Suh Joe Haden Gerald McCoy Aldon Smith Ezekiel Ansah Khalil Mack Anthony Barr
Raiders have Cooper and Mack now. You telling me that franchise would be better off not being in the top 10? Those 2 years?
Lot of these franchises got turn around thanks to 1 player...
What the hell are you talking about??!!! Do you want us to pick in the top 10 or not? Either way here's the thing...the NFL doesn't just hand out top 10 picks because teams want them really bad...you have to SUCK to get them.
Further I could give two shits what PFF thinks about Elliot because I think PFF is garbage. All I know is Dallas had the same line last year and their run game sucked...and now it doesn't. All I know is Elliot can do it all as a running back, get outside, run between the tackles, run on the goal line and score in the open field because he won't get caught from behind...oh yeah and he can block and catch. So you can take PFF's analysis and use it for toilet paper, because thats what it's worth.
PFF, at least on their line grades is about as inaccurate as you can get; and again the OL isn't going to help a RB that is past 5 yards of the LoS. Elliott is a beast when he gets to the 2nd level, he's a joy to watch. There is all sorts of ways to draft a stud in the 1st round, especially high, the best way to not do it is to pass up a stud and take a lesser talent b/c of position. Wonder how many teams are regretting passing on Todd Gurly, and I wonder If the Raiders regret not drafting a def "stud" like vic Beasley intsead of Cooper. How good does Gurley look in that Atl O right about now?
The higher you are in the first round the better chance you have to hit on a stud.
What is not hard to understand?
No one is doubting that. Not a single person here. High picks produce better players, we had this same argument on the other board over QBs and you denied the same thing you are posting now. Yet, even though you are saying this now, here is a list of positions you have advocated don't need to be drafted in the first round:
QB RB WR G C TE non-pass rushing DL ILB as opposed to pass rushing OLB
What some of us are having a hard time with are the contradictions in your arguments:
Better players, HOF players, play-makers need to be drafted early, you just said that. Except that doesn't apply to QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, C, and Gs ( I may be leaving a position out, can't remember.) You say Cooper would have been a better pick than White (which no one is arguing) but you also say never draft a WR in the first. Bosa is 'better' than Floyd, yet you labeled Bosa a bust before the draft had even started and would never have taken him. Then you have listed EE as a playmaker yet consider drafting him a bad choice. Your entire draft strategy was Buckner or trade down. So which is it? And even though Buckner is having a solid year how come you never mention him?
You aren't totally wrong in your positions, its just that you take such a hard line and then bob and weave when the discussion starts. I always read your threads because the better discussions are in them.
I don't think I ever said not to draft a QB in the first. This year I don't want a QB because I'm not a fan of the options. I was all in on Wentz last year.
RB - You can find great RBs later on in the draft. WR - Depends on the situation. Does this team have a long term QB? If so go ahead but if not you're just wasting a pick. Raiders have Carr and gave him a weapon. G - Packers O-line was built out of later picks.. Heck Josh Sitton was a 4th round pick C - Same as above TE - Huge fan of Hunter Henry. Its a skilled position that can easily be gotten in the 2nd round and was the case for him DL - agreed ILB - I was a huge fan of Smith and Jack. Always wanted them here.
Cooper was a smart choice for the Raiders. They had their QB of the future with them and decided to give him a weapon. We don't have our QB yet. EE was smart for the Cowboys. They have the best O-line in the league and can make any RB look like the next great one. Our O-line is a mess
Never called Bosa a bust...
I never mention Buckner cause most of the board knows my opinion on him. I always liked him coming out of the draft.
No one is doubting that. Not a single person here. High picks produce better players, we had this same argument on the other board over QBs and you denied the same thing you are posting now. Yet, even though you are saying this now, here is a list of positions you have advocated don't need to be drafted in the first round:
QB RB WR G C TE non-pass rushing DL ILB as opposed to pass rushing OLB
What some of us are having a hard time with are the contradictions in your arguments:
Better players, HOF players, play-makers need to be drafted early, you just said that. Except that doesn't apply to QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, C, and Gs ( I may be leaving a position out, can't remember.) You say Cooper would have been a better pick than White (which no one is arguing) but you also say never draft a WR in the first. Bosa is 'better' than Floyd, yet you labeled Bosa a bust before the draft had even started and would never have taken him. Then you have listed EE as a playmaker yet consider drafting him a bad choice. Your entire draft strategy was Buckner or trade down. So which is it? And even though Buckner is having a solid year how come you never mention him?
You aren't totally wrong in your positions, its just that you take such a hard line and then bob and weave when the discussion starts. I always read your threads because the better discussions are in them.
I don't think I ever said not to draft a QB in the first. This year I don't want a QB because I'm not a fan of the options. I was all in on Wentz last year.
RB - You can find great RBs later on in the draft. WR - Depends on the situation. Does this team have a long term QB? If so go ahead but if not you're just wasting a pick. Raiders have Carr and gave him a weapon. G - Packers O-line was built out of later picks.. Heck Josh Sitton was a 4th round pick C - Same as above TE - Huge fan of Hunter Henry. Its a skilled position that can easily be gotten in the 2nd round and was the case for him DL - agreed ILB - I was a huge fan of Smith and Jack. Always wanted them here.
Cooper was a smart choice for the Raiders. They had their QB of the future with them and decided to give him a weapon. We don't have our QB yet. EE was smart for the Cowboys. They have the best O-line in the league and can make any RB look like the next great one. Our O-line is a mess
Never called Bosa a bust...
I never mention Buckner cause most of the board knows my opinion on him. I always liked him coming out of the draft.
Oh my God. You claimed there was never a reason to draft a QB in the first round. Several posters went round and round with you. You went as far back as Roger Staubach to argue your case. Whats the point of discussing anything with you if you can't be honest about what you posted previously? You weren't all in on Wertz. Deliberate lie. Your entire pre-draft strategy was trade up for Buckner or trade down. Anything else you claim now is a deliberate lie.
Should I find the post where you just said "You never draft a WR in the first round." What about the posts about how great WRs and great RBs have never won SBs so drafting them early was a waste of a pick.
And now you are claiming mine and others argument for EE to the Cowboys.
All I can say is wow. There is literally no point in ever engaging you in discussion again. Between the flip-flops, the distortions of other arguments, the propping up of strawmen, and now the deliberate dishonesty, whats the point? Seriously. Whats the point?
I don't think I ever said not to draft a QB in the first. This year I don't want a QB because I'm not a fan of the options. I was all in on Wentz last year.
RB - You can find great RBs later on in the draft. WR - Depends on the situation. Does this team have a long term QB? If so go ahead but if not you're just wasting a pick. Raiders have Carr and gave him a weapon. G - Packers O-line was built out of later picks.. Heck Josh Sitton was a 4th round pick C - Same as above TE - Huge fan of Hunter Henry. Its a skilled position that can easily be gotten in the 2nd round and was the case for him DL - agreed ILB - I was a huge fan of Smith and Jack. Always wanted them here.
Cooper was a smart choice for the Raiders. They had their QB of the future with them and decided to give him a weapon. We don't have our QB yet. EE was smart for the Cowboys. They have the best O-line in the league and can make any RB look like the next great one. Our O-line is a mess
Never called Bosa a bust...
I never mention Buckner cause most of the board knows my opinion on him. I always liked him coming out of the draft.
Oh my God. You claimed there was never a reason to draft a QB in the first round. Several posters went round and round with you. You went as far back as Roger Staubach to argue your case. Whats the point of discussing anything with you if you can't be honest about what you posted previously? You weren't all in on Wertz. Deliberate lie. Your entire pre-draft strategy was trade up for Buckner or trade down. Anything else you claim now is a deliberate lie.
Should I find the post where you just said "You never draft a WR in the first round." What about the posts about how great WRs and great RBs have never won SBs so drafting them early was a waste of a pick.
And now you are claiming mine and others argument for EE to the Cowboys.
All I can say is wow. There is literally no point in ever engaging you in discussion again. Between the flip-flops, the distortions of other arguments, the propping up of strawmen, and now the deliberate dishonesty, whats the point? Seriously. Whats the point?
It seems like you're losing it.
Find me a post in which I said Wentz wasn't the answer. Tell Loki to look it up as well. I was a huge supporter of Wentz and felt if we were to draft him he was the guy. I was never a fan of Goff.
Yes my pre-draft was trade up for Buckner because going up to high would cost us too much. Wentz was out of the question when we had all the holes we did.
Name me a franchise WR who was the sole reason of winning a Super Bowl. Show me a great RB who won a Super Bowl on his own. Without the help of a top defense or HoF QB.. A great QB or a great defense wins titles. Always has..
If you want to make up lies go ahead.
I still stand by EE being overrated back. He's a product of that O-line but he has good speed on him.
Its not even worth talking to you anymore. I can count 4 lies in just this one post. Let me know when you are ready to have open, honest and real discussion. I actually hoped you would improve once you got away from that other board. Silly me.