That's what I would do, but I'm no expert

I think most people are still alright with Pace.  I myself like Pace but I'm getting tired of Fox.  I just think his way of doing things doesn't work and hate how holds everything back from the fans like he's keeping game changing secrets.  I'm fine with keeping him or letting him go after the year.

Are we talking about Ski again?

I agree.. Loggains has to go if Fox wants to stay. I think that McCoy might be available after this season.. As for McDaniels, no I don't want him as a head coach here.. 

I don't know how many people are on this site right now. I would venture maybe 60ish, and I bet there are maybe 40 different views on this. I think it is very rare for the FO to tank on purpose. Indy may be the only one and of course no one can prove that one either.

I think you play for the future if this year is not going to lead anywhere. In other words, whoever you think is going to  be your future, play them. It means you are still trying to be better, but for next year. You are not giving up... just regrouping for a meaningful fight --- when you have a chance.

As far as firing the coaches. Yes, I do think that there are far more knee jerk reactions to that issue than there needs to be. However, stability for stabilities sake is a bad idea. A VERY bad idea. Take the extreme example. Keeping Trestman and Tucker for stabilities sake. There is good stability and bad stability. Keeping the same thing when bad is worse than trying something new, IMO.

The huge piece of subjectivity here is whether or not Fox is now a hindrance or an asset. I think the line forms depending on your lean. For people that have not made up their mind, a reasonable stance is in fact to keep him to be sure. Everyone is going to have an opion on when to pull the plug. Personally, I could see issues with Lovie and think we should have pulled the plug earlier, but that's me.

Right here in todays situation, I never thought Fox was going to get us a SB win, eventually warmed up to him being the right guy to lead a rebuild. I have seen corporate dysfunction in a rainbow of colors and can probably spot it faster than most. IMO, Fox is not the guy to lead the rebuild. He rubs players the wrong way, makes bad decisions, and quite frankly to me anyway, even with his wealth of experience seems a little lost to me. Yes we have injuries and I think most on the board are now smart enough not to blow that trumpet. I have not seen anyone go that route this time. Even with injuries, we are underperforming. And that is the measurement to me. Yes, we need more talent. But the cupboard is no longer bare like it was under Emery. One win with our schedule is underperformance.

For me, I say once i see a guy that is not cutting it, just make the move and try to get better. I don't want another year of half assed (not to be confused with this board as reported by some on the old board) play and second guessing Fox as a HC. I don't like what I see, so yes, I am behind the change.