There may have been some gypsy moths on the tree he crashed into, do they count?
This is another punch in the gut, just when he was making progress and showing what he's capable of. Have the bears said what the injury is? I can't find anything other than the possible high ankle sprain. It would be useful to know what it is this time. I need to know if we should keep blaming the medical/conditioning teams or keep blaming Jerry...
The Chicago Bears announced Wednesday they placed the former first-round pick on injured reserve after suffering a fractured left fibula and a high ankle sprain in the team's Week 4 win over the Detroit Lions.
If he needs surgery I imagine he's out for another year. If they don't they might be able to bring him back later in the season.
This re opens the door for Wilson to contribute after his IR is up.
It's one step forward and two steps back for Kevin White.
NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported Wednesday that Bears players expect the second-year receiver will miss an extended period of time due to an ankle injury he suffered last week.
White was in the midst of his best game as a pro before injury struck. The 6-foot-3 wideout snagged six of his nine targets for 55 yards before leaving midway through the third quarter. White finally displayed toughness at the point of the catch and an ability to box out defenders. White's role had grown the past two weeks with Brian Hoyer spreading the ball around.
White missed his entire rookie season after suffering a stress fracture in his shin last year.
The Bears offered an intriguing trio of receivers with Alshon Jeffery's ability to win down field, Eddie Royal's run-after-the-catch acumen and White's big-body play. With White out, Cameron Meredith will take snaps as the No. 3 receiver. Expect tight end Zach Miller's role in the offense to grow even further.
The Bears started the season a depressing 1-3 with an injury-plagued, talent-poor roster that ranks 30th on Around The NFL's quarter-mark Power Poll. Watching the growth of young players like White, running back Jordan Howard and a litter of secondary cubs over the course of the season is what the fan base was counting on tracking. White can't make progress while he's on the sidelines.
So if Meredith puts up better stats then White can we discuss if White should be traded or benched?
No b/c White is a 10+ year veteran that has a bad case of the turn over yips
So if Meredith puts up better stats then White can we discuss if White should be traded or benched?
No b/c White is a 10+ year veteran that has a bad case of the turn over yips
But I thought it was by production only..hasn't that been posted? Didn't Fox say that? What difference does it make if he's a 10 year vet or a 2nd year player? Guy with the most production starts right? No matter draft position, right?
I really have no dog in this fight. Hoyer/Cutler/Berkley...neither one is going to lead the Bears to the playoff any time soon. I'd rather be starting Berkley at this point to see what he has/is. Its not like White had suddenly turned a corner.
But lets be consistant. When Meredith out performs White, he gets the starting position next season.
White was in the midst of his best game as a pro before injury struck. The 6-foot-3 wideout snagged six of his nine targets for 55 yards before leaving midway through the third quarter.
This would have meant that his best game would have seen him finish with what...80 yards? I like White, he still has potential (the dreaded p-word), but if he isn't producing, according to most posters here, he gets benched.
Either way, its a moot point, he's on IR for the second straight season. Guess he's more injury prone than Jeffery at this point.
No. Just no. You cannot compare a WR w/less then 2 years in the league to a 10yr qb.
Sure I can. You have a WR who doesn't know the route tree, can't stay healthy but somehow deserves to start over a second WR who is healthy and capable of putting up the same stats if not better than first WR. Its all about the production, unless ... it really not. So is it about...potential? Some other intangable?
Go back to the 10 year vet QB with turnover issues. Is this turnover issue new or have they plauged him his whole career? Whole career? So he's going to put up 1.7 turnovers a game? Is he more talented than the other QB (whose turns the ball over at a 1.4 clip or marginally better)? But is it about talent (ie potential) or production? What has the second QB (who by the way is an 8 year vet) shown over his career that tell us he is the better option? Two good games in a row against bad defenses? Is that what we are basing this on?
I'll say it again...I don't care who the QB is. IMO Cutler is the better option going forward. People disagree. Thats ok. But when the same logic is applied to another position, the argument changes?
No. Just no. You cannot compare a WR w/less then 2 years in the league to a 10yr qb.
Sure I can. You have a WR who doesn't know the route tree, can't stay healthy but somehow deserves to start over a second WR who is healthy and capable of putting up the same stats if not better than first WR. Its all about the production, unless ... it really not. So is it about...potential? Some other intangable?
Go back to the 10 year vet QB with turnover issues. Is this turnover issue new or have they plauged him his whole career? Whole career? So he's going to put up 1.7 turnovers a game? Is he more talented than the other QB (whose turns the ball over at a 1.4 clip or marginally better)? But is it about talent (ie potential) or production? What has the second QB (who by the way is an 8 year vet) shown over his career that tell us he is the better option? Two good games in a row against bad defenses? Is that what we are basing this on?
I'll say it again...I don't care who the QB is. IMO Cutler is the better option going forward. People disagree. Thats ok. But when the same logic is applied to another position, the argument changes?
WR still learning the job b/c he's played 4 games vs a qb that has been in the league 10 years. Yes it's been his whole career.
He had problems w/turnovers his entire career, minus 1 or 2 years. 176 int's and fumbles over 10 years, 136 games. Thats 1.29 TO per games, when he only has 1.5 TD's per game. that is a TO issue. So you are better off having a QB that is less talented, throws less TD's, but also turns the ball over far less. B/c in today's NFL it is to easy to put points on the board, giving the other team extra chances is detrimental to winning.