By the way, the opponents average drive started on the 29 yard line. Thats only 5 yards worse than the best average drive against of 24 yards. Tell me more about all this awful field position the defense was put in.
At this point I feel the need, lest any of you think I'm crazy, to point out that I do not want Fangio fired. I understand the REASONS why the defense performed the way it did. I'm merely using the logic presented to me across the board to make a point.
At this point I feel the need, lest any of you think I'm crazy, to point out that I do not want Fangio fired. I understand the REASONS why the defense performed the way it did. I'm merely using the logic presented to me across the board to make a point.
At this point I feel the need, lest any of you think I'm crazy, to point out that I do not want Fangio fired. I understand the REASONS why the defense performed the way it did. I'm merely using the logic presented to me across the board to make a point.
It didn't work
LOL...yeah...it never does it seems with some people.
By the way, the opponents average drive started on the 29 yard line. Thats only 5 yards worse than the best average drive against of 24 yards. Tell me more about all this awful field position the defense was put in.
AVERAGE.... but what about the AVERAGE after a Turnover. That's when we got scored on.
As much as I never wanted Fox, and wish he would get fired, no one was going to win here w/this roster. The talent level isn't there. People point to how great Shea has been for NE, bs, Shea has been Shea for NE they just don't expect anymore or less out of him then what he is, a guy that might make a play, maybe 2 a game. His #'s are basically the same there as they were in Chicago, and he's only started 4 games for them.
Look at the turnovers over the last several years, bottom of the league. Coaches cannot teach turn overs, you have to have guys that are talented enough to make them happen. Peanut/BU/Briggs/Brown/Harris etc etc, talent gets turnovers. There is next to none on this team so no turn overs.
Fix the QB position 1st, fix the DB's 2nd and you'll start winning regardless of the HC.
btw, this was the problem w/bringing in Fox, what does an old coach want to do w/a rebuild, he wants to in, or so says all the people that say we cannot draft and start a young qb. If that was the case then Fox was the wrong hire.
As much as I never wanted Fox, and wish he would get fired, no one was going to win here w/this roster. The talent level isn't there. People point to how great Shea has been for NE, bs, Shea has been Shea for NE they just don't expect anymore or less out of him then what he is, a guy that might make a play, maybe 2 a game. His #'s are basically the same there as they were in Chicago, and he's only started 4 games for them.
Look at the turnovers over the last several years, bottom of the league. Coaches cannot teach turn overs, you have to have guys that are talented enough to make them happen. Peanut/BU/Briggs/Brown/Harris etc etc, talent gets turnovers. There is next to none on this team so no turn overs.
Fix the QB position 1st, fix the DB's 2nd and you'll start winning regardless of the HC.
btw, this was the problem w/bringing in Fox, what does an old coach want to do w/a rebuild, he wants to in, or so says all the people that say we cannot draft and start a young qb. If that was the case then Fox was the wrong hire.
You could have given Trestman the 85 Bears or the last Denver SB team and they would not have won with him as HC. Neither team would have worked to it's full potential. Sorry, but it's not just a coach and it's not just the players. To minimize the impact of either part of that equation just means you will not achieve your goals.
As much as I never wanted Fox, and wish he would get fired, no one was going to win here w/this roster. The talent level isn't there. People point to how great Shea has been for NE, bs, Shea has been Shea for NE they just don't expect anymore or less out of him then what he is, a guy that might make a play, maybe 2 a game. His #'s are basically the same there as they were in Chicago, and he's only started 4 games for them.
Look at the turnovers over the last several years, bottom of the league. Coaches cannot teach turn overs, you have to have guys that are talented enough to make them happen. Peanut/BU/Briggs/Brown/Harris etc etc, talent gets turnovers. There is next to none on this team so no turn overs.
Fix the QB position 1st, fix the DB's 2nd and you'll start winning regardless of the HC.
btw, this was the problem w/bringing in Fox, what does an old coach want to do w/a rebuild, he wants to in, or so says all the people that say we cannot draft and start a young qb. If that was the case then Fox was the wrong hire.
You could have given Trestman the 85 Bears or the last Denver SB team and they would not have won with him as HC. Neither team would have worked to it's full potential. Sorry, but it's not just a coach and it's not just the players. To minimize the impact of either part of that equation just means you will not achieve your goals.
I don't know that you can prove that. Fox is a "good coach" and couldn't win w/the same players that Trestman had, that's why they got rid of them. Billy B up there in NE failed miserably in Cleveland before he became a HoF'r for the Pats.
HC/coaches in general are over valued. Lovie, Mike Martz, Ditka, all won b/c of far superior talent on the field compared to the other teams, when they no longer had the talent edge they lost and lost big. Hell Barry F'n Switzer was a SB winning coach, but not b/c he did anything. Same w/Gruden, for all the love he gets, he won w/another coaches talent and then couldn't do shit.
Fox won in Den b/c there was talent top to bottom, he's losing here b/c there is very little talent. Billy B couldn't win w/the turds in Chicago.
You could have given Trestman the 85 Bears or the last Denver SB team and they would not have won with him as HC. Neither team would have worked to it's full potential. Sorry, but it's not just a coach and it's not just the players. To minimize the impact of either part of that equation just means you will not achieve your goals.
I don't know that you can prove that. Fox is a "good coach" and couldn't win w/the same players that Trestman had, that's why they got rid of them. Billy B up there in NE failed miserably in Cleveland before he became a HoF'r for the Pats.
HC/coaches in general are over valued. Lovie, Mike Martz, Ditka, all won b/c of far superior talent on the field compared to the other teams, when they no longer had the talent edge they lost and lost big. Hell Barry F'n Switzer was a SB winning coach, but not b/c he did anything. Same w/Gruden, for all the love he gets, he won w/another coaches talent and then couldn't do shit.
Fox won in Den b/c there was talent top to bottom, he's losing here b/c there is very little talent. Billy B couldn't win w/the turds in Chicago.
I can't. Unless I had a time machine and could try both. But it's still what I firmly believe.
I don't know that you can prove that. Fox is a "good coach" and couldn't win w/the same players that Trestman had, that's why they got rid of them. Billy B up there in NE failed miserably in Cleveland before he became a HoF'r for the Pats.
HC/coaches in general are over valued. Lovie, Mike Martz, Ditka, all won b/c of far superior talent on the field compared to the other teams, when they no longer had the talent edge they lost and lost big. Hell Barry F'n Switzer was a SB winning coach, but not b/c he did anything. Same w/Gruden, for all the love he gets, he won w/another coaches talent and then couldn't do shit.
Fox won in Den b/c there was talent top to bottom, he's losing here b/c there is very little talent. Billy B couldn't win w/the turds in Chicago.
I can't. Unless I had a time machine and could try both. But it's still what I firmly believe.
People firmly believe that the earth is flat, doesn't make it true. Again, HC's, highly over rated, they win w/and b/c of the talent on the field. It's not like there is some great scheme out there that they are running that no other team knows about or runs.