Fox & Trestman Teams. Why the different attitude?

Hub was on the radio earlier today saying how he really thought this defense could be pretty good next season. Fill a couple more holes and stay healthy and it could very easily be a top 10 D.

That's certainly not the worst idea you've had.  I think everyone can agree that Loggains needs to go.  Cutler, I don't care if he stays or goes but I expect him to be gone.

Different cultures different players coming from different circumstances.

Lovie to Trestman
Def minded coach created a culture where the team played for and only for the HC; especially the def players. Moved away from that HC which created huge amounts of resentment from the players. On top of that you brought in a weak HC w/no experience that was bringing in a new Offensive mind instead of Defensive, which meant the players ran the locker room, and they weren't on board w/the hire. Worst of all, you didn't remove the problem children, instead they cultivated an us vs the HC mentality. They also didn't try and turn over the roster, instead tried to keep a core that wanted nothing to do w/the HC together.

Trestman to Fox
Remove weak HC and bring in strong HC, and right off the bat create huge amounts of turn around, including bad attitudes(Briggs/Marshal etc). Over 1/2 the roster was turned over year 1, and 95% was turned over year 2. The roster is younger, more content and overall better.

Both had a lot of injuries, but the new team is aware that they could be better and want to be. Not sure you could say that about the previous roster.

I imagine if Trestman was still a coach with nothing but scraps the Bears will be worse than the Browns..