Post by JABF on May 14, 2024 19:58:27 GMT -6
I did. What you now see is an article gets repeated multiple times by others and they put their clickbait titles on it to spin it so you click to read what the heck is going on. In this case basically asking the question if the Bears have a bust in Caleb... then when you read the actual article it quotes someone else - that does NOT say anything like that... just that Caleb missed a few passes - and one was almost intercepted.
Just one other recent example is what we've seen in the last 48 hours painting Fields as basically a cancer in the locker room... but if you read any of these it's not what the title is intimating but rather Fields and the other two QBs didn't get along. They quote an anonymous coach here (no long with the Bears) or just an anonymous "source" and then they basically do a number on Fields' reputation.
EDIT: One of the better podcasts I saw a couple days ago mentioned that we should "strap in" because in the regular season we are going to see a lot more of this anti-Caleb stuff when he has real interceptions or the Bears lose a game. We will see this taken to a whole new level.
Same with Williams. He missed what he missed. So what? Why is an article saying he missed throws a problem? Especially when he missed throws. Is it going to make me wish we didn't draft him? Not likely. When I see him play, I'll decide what I think of him. Some dude reporting what happened on the field does not make any difference to me as long as what is reported is not important. A QB missing a few throws at the very beginning of being with team mates is meaningless. At the same time, I also honestly don't understand the vitriol directed at the people writing this stuff. It happened and they are giving their opinions and making some possible projections. I don't think anyone said he was a bust. But if they did, again, so what? Saying it does not make it so. All it does is impinge on the guys credibility.
I just don't get the hostile reaction to a guys opinion even if it is almost certainly wrong. Who knows. Maybe I'm wrong. So then maybe I deserve being attacked. LOL, wouldn't be the first time
I've never been shy about calling BS when I see it. But I am not trying to be hostile or attack people. I don't intend to give that impression but maybe I come across that way. If I do, then I am sorry. Sincerely, I apologize. My intent is to question articles that seem to be sensationalized click bait. Regarding the Caleb incomplete passes. That was reported by many legit sources - along with the balanced reporting that he was simply amazingly accurate. But some sources did the clickbait title thing - LOL, like the Bears reporting version of National Enquirer tabloid journalism clearly intended to get clicks or views. Basically, I am a Bears fan. I love the team. I love this present team. If some of these clickbait articles are trashing the team or players, I do call BS.