This is an evaluation model that evaluates a number of factors to predict:
Bust Potential
Potential to be an adequate starter
Potential to be an upper tier starter
Potential to be a Hall of Fame tier player
They run the top quarterbacks in this year's draft class through the model and come up with interesting predictions. It's a quick read. I'm curious what you think of it.
LINK 2024 NFL draft quarterback projections: Stats and more We present this year's QBASE 2.0 projections for the 2024 quarterback class. QBASE 2.0 is a combination of Andrew Healy's (2015) original QBASE model and Olbrecht and Rosen's (2018) functional mobility model. It factors in a quarterback's college passing statistics adjusted for the quality of his teammates and opponents, as well as the number of years he started in college. It also incorporates his rushing ability (see Daniels), and while it rewards improvements over time (Daniels again), it penalizes one-year wonders (once again, Daniels).
The quarterbacks below are listed in order of ranking on a consensus big board, and interpreting each quarterback's projection is straightforward. A value of 0 Total defense-adjusted yards above replacement per attempt (TDYAR/A) is replacement-level, whereas any value over 1.5 is indicative of a Hall of Fame career. We run 50,000 simulations to provide a distribution of the number of times that each quarterback falls within a particular range. Here are our 2024 projections.
This is an evaluation model that evaluates a number of factors to predict:
Bust Potential
Potential to be an adequate starter
Potential to be an upper tier starter
Potential to be a Hall of Fame tier player
They run the top quarterbacks in this year's draft class through the model and come up with interesting predictions. It's a quick read. I'm curious what you think of it.
LINK 2024 NFL draft quarterback projections: Stats and more We present this year's QBASE 2.0 projections for the 2024 quarterback class. QBASE 2.0 is a combination of Andrew Healy's (2015) original QBASE model and Olbrecht and Rosen's (2018) functional mobility model. It factors in a quarterback's college passing statistics adjusted for the quality of his teammates and opponents, as well as the number of years he started in college. It also incorporates his rushing ability (see Daniels), and while it rewards improvements over time (Daniels again), it penalizes one-year wonders (once again, Daniels).
The quarterbacks below are listed in order of ranking on a consensus big board, and interpreting each quarterback's projection is straightforward. A value of 0 Total defense-adjusted yards above replacement per attempt (TDYAR/A) is replacement-level, whereas any value over 1.5 is indicative of a Hall of Fame career. We run 50,000 simulations to provide a distribution of the number of times that each quarterback falls within a particular range. Here are our 2024 projections.
Looks like its behind a paywall.
Also looks incomplete - no Potential to be generational
This is an evaluation model that evaluates a number of factors to predict:
They have J.Daniels as a 37.7% bust risk. J.J. McCarthy as a 45.9% bust risk. They have Maye as a 49.2% bust risk. Bo Nix as a 54.1% bust risk. Michael Penix Jr. as a 68.2% bust risk. Spencer Rattler as a 90.5% bust risk.
They have J.Daniels as a 37.7% bust risk. J.J. McCarthy as a 45.9% bust risk. They have Maye as a 49.2% bust risk. Bo Nix as a 54.1% bust risk. Michael Penix Jr. as a 68.2% bust risk. Spencer Rattler as a 90.5% bust risk.
so 54.7% he is adequate or worse and 45.3% he is upper tier or above. Goes to show how big a crapshoot a new QB is
They have J.Daniels as a 37.7% bust risk. J.J. McCarthy as a 45.9% bust risk. They have Maye as a 49.2% bust risk. Bo Nix as a 54.1% bust risk. Michael Penix Jr. as a 68.2% bust risk. Spencer Rattler as a 90.5% bust risk.
so 54.7% he is adequate or worse and 45.3% he is upper tier or above. Goes to show how big a crapshoot a new QB is
That's is so true. Now, I don't know how accurate that model is, but the point is that there is no sure thing in the draft and never has been. I do believe we have a legit shot at a great QB with him. But it's a gamble. Or, maybe a better description would be a calculated risk because there is some research and some supporting data behind the draft pick - but it's still a risk. That's sports though. This whole approach by Poles is different. It feels different too. Courtney Cronin, in that video describes it as "planning for more than one year" and "it looks like they have a well thought out plan" - that's a quote too. She talks about 2025 too. At around the 30-minute mark she talks about the coaching change after the season ended was not the best move - that continuity and building on what has already been installed is something the Bears haven't done (like this) before. It feels different (her words). The cycling through coaches/GMs is not the way to create a successful situation. They can't afford to be the "same old Bears" -"now they've made it through the big part of the storm" - "this iteration of the Bears feels different" and talks about the Caleb pick, new stadium coming, and basically talked the anti-meatball fan talk.
I don't know if Caleb will pan out. But I think this could be the beginning of something different than our failed past - Courtney said it looks like the Poles and Eberflus plan "looks like there are some legs to it" and it's beginning to look like it will come to fruition (her term).
Will this all work? Don't know. I like what I see so far though.
They have J.Daniels as a 37.7% bust risk. J.J. McCarthy as a 45.9% bust risk. They have Maye as a 49.2% bust risk. Bo Nix as a 54.1% bust risk. Michael Penix Jr. as a 68.2% bust risk. Spencer Rattler as a 90.5% bust risk.
so 54.7% he is adequate or worse and 45.3% he is upper tier or above. Goes to show how big a crapshoot a new QB is
Yep. What a crap shoot it is picking a QB. Best one of late was the last guy drafted! Here are the others.. (Is Trubisky hurting Maye lol)
This is an evaluation model that evaluates a number of factors to predict:
Bust Potential
Potential to be an adequate starter
Potential to be an upper tier starter
Potential to be a Hall of Fame tier player
They run the top quarterbacks in this year's draft class through the model and come up with interesting predictions. It's a quick read. I'm curious what you think of it.
Looks like its behind a paywall.
There are some legit ways around paywalls but I dont think they work inside a site (like Espn+ inside espn but I could be wrong).
I would love to see what the model would have been for the quarterbacks in all the past draft classes going back to the Mahomes draft class just to see what it would have predicted for current NFL QBs.
I would love to see what the model would have been for the quarterbacks in all the past draft classes going back to the Mahomes draft class just to see what it would have predicted for current NFL QBs.
+1 Listening to the countless "experts" talk about the QB bust rate I come away with one common factor. It matters greatly where these guys land when drafted. Talent is one factor, but equally important is the environment that rookie QB is in (coaches and players). If you don't have both factors you bust. And this past week we've heard some talk about how it is nearly impossible to "fix" a QB who has been broken by the drafting team. I know this seems incredibly basic, a "water is wet" statement, but so many Bears fans don't seem to grasp this. They really fail to understand that the coaching and supporting talent matters... it is a critically make-or-break important factor. And we've broken more than our share here in Chicago over the decades. But fans write that off as "they drafted the wrong guy... so draft a new guy and count it all good." It is delusional thinking... but it is what it is. Meatball stuff. JMO.