Leonard Floyd Has More Sacks Than These Studs Did As Rookies

Your theory was you take def first, it shouldn't matter.

Fact is bad GM's(last I checked you weren't a fan of Pace) apparently pick good O over bad.

Guess Indy should have taken a Def player instead of Manning
Guess GB should have taken a def player instead of Rogers(shit they had Farve remember).

You take the BPA, or at least BPA based on need. You do not draft DE/OLB in the first every time regardless of situation, it's a poor theory at it's base.

I like the kid. At this point, I agree that you definitely can not say he is a stud or will be in the Hall of fame. Not enough time yet, but when you have more sacks than other rookies, you are on your way.
One thing I am very comfortable saying now is that he is not a bust.
At the beginning of the year, I still was not calling him a bust (although to be honest, I really felt there was a good chance he was going to be) because again, he needed more time. But at this point in time (JMO), while the beast or stud label still does not fit him, I don't see how anyone could legitimately call him a bust. He has far exceeded what I thought he was going to accomplish based on how he started. And he has not started all the games. I'd be happy to be wrong on another half a dozen young Bears like I was with him.

All in one season?

I actually feel bad for the guy. Everything I have read about him says that he has a tremendous attitude and work ethic. The guy is WAY rawer than I ever expected though and he needs field time. It will be season three and he still won't be much more than a rookie. Plus, they are running out of places to put new rods in his body.