I''m calling it nothing more than click bait and pure BS. Why not just keep Cutler? There's not much difference between the two with the exception of Romo being 3 years older. A move like that is a nexus between idiotic and plain old insane.
Post by germansbombedph on Nov 15, 2016 5:50:33 GMT -6
Depending on the asking Price, I'd be interested. We still would Need to draft a QB but we would be allowed to sit him for 5-8 games. At that time, Romo will get injured and we get to see our new Franchise QB
I''m calling it nothing more than click bait and pure BS. Why not just keep Cutler? There's not much difference between the two with the exception of Romo being 3 years older. A move like that is a nexus between idiotic and plain old insane.
Romo is 1000% a better QB then Cutler. Most of his problems are over hyped by the media. Romo 1 more season in the league, 40 more td's, 30 less int's 26 less fumbles. And it wasn't until the last 2 years that they had a stud OL, most of his OL's have been garbage also. But you cannot bring in a broken QB onto this turf w/anything less then an elite OL, bears aren't bad but they aren't elite, he just wouldn't last.
I agree the Bears aren't going to go after a QB on the verge of retiring who has a problem staying healthy. It'd be pointless. I can understand why Dallas is shopping Romo though, Dak is their starter you cannot take a qb out that is playing the way Dak should be.