Post by vickashley on Sept 16, 2017 15:21:09 GMT -6
Sept 16, 2017 15:14:54 GMT -6 @soulman said:
What exactly does the "Hippocratic Oath" have to do with anything here please, can you help me understand because I read your whole post and I always thought that the "Hippocratic Oath" was a vow that Medical Doctors take and it's like a moral and ethical thing for helping patients with medical ailments and always treating them no matter why even if you are like a black doctor and the patient is a Nazi skinhead but nothing like having to do with bears players or the front office as far as I can see, makes no sense to me so what is the explanation for beginning a post talking about a physician's vow to keep people healthy and save lives when it's about a football team?
Didn't my first sentence tie that caution into what my post was about? It was used in a quote of mp's post and I knew he'd realize what I was getting at. That's how I tied it in to the rest of my points about the mismanagement under the McCaskeys. Does it make sense now?
I'll just fall back on the basic summation of a key part the Hippocratic Oath which is "First Do No Harm" and every time the McCaskey's have decided just winning wasn't quite enough they've done tremendous harm.
"First do no harm"[edit]
Main article: Primum non nocere
; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primum_non_nocere
It is often said that the phrase "First do no harm" (Latin: Primum non nocere) is a part of the Hippocratic oath. The phrase as such does not appear in the oath, although the oath does contain Latin: ... noxamvero et maleficium propulsabo (Also ... I will utterly reject harm and mischief).[4] The phrase "primum non nocere" is believed to date from the 17th century (see detailed discussion in the article on the phrase).
Another equivalent phrase is found in Epidemics, Book I, of the Hippocratic school: "Practice two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient".[5] The exact phrase is believed to have originated with the 19th-century surgeon Thomas Inman.[6]
Didn't my first sentence tie that caution into what my post was about?
I'll just fall back on the basic summation of the Hippocratic Oath which seems to be "First Do No Harm" and every time the McCaskey's have decided just winning wasn't quite enough they've done tremendous harm.
I guess that makes sense but I'm not dumb or illiterate you literally posted the same sentences twice to be condescending it seems or maybe I am reading too much into it but you did literally type the same thing twice.