Post by germansbombedph on Jan 19, 2017 8:02:51 GMT -6
How would we get better by overpaying for Glennon? If anything, take your rookie QB or trade for McCarron/Garoppolo or be a bit cheaper for your Hoyers of the world and use that saved Money on QB protection or depth.
How would we get better by overpaying for Glennon? If anything, take your rookie QB or trade for McCarron/Garoppolo or be a bit cheaper for your Hoyers of the world and use that saved Money on QB protection or depth.
See how that quoting thing works? Anyway...you don't want us to over pay for a much younger qb who hasn't seriously injured his back twice, but want us to do that for a 37 year old who has seriously injured his back twice, hasn't played a full season since 2012, and is at the end of his career? You don't make a lot of sense here.
How would we get better by overpaying for Glennon? If anything, take your rookie QB or trade for McCarron/Garoppolo or be a bit cheaper for your Hoyers of the world and use that saved Money on QB protection or depth.
See how that quoting thing works? Anyway...you don't want us to over pay for a much younger qb who hasn't seriously injured his back twice, but want us to do that for a 37 year old who has seriously injured his back twice, hasn't played a full season since 2012, and is at the end of his career? You don't make a lot of sense here.
You always preach about Quality. Tell me how adding Glennon would be adding that much Quality? enough with all of those backups or journey guys that aren't good enough to stick.
We have to draft our guy and get him ready and prepared. Adding Romo would buy us time in developing that drafted guy - that could be a QB like Kizer, Mahomes or Webb. Romo is above average when he is healthy, Glennon isn't. Add to that that Glennon will end up overpaid and I don't understand how one would really be interested in him as starter.
See how that quoting thing works? Anyway...you don't want us to over pay for a much younger qb who hasn't seriously injured his back twice, but want us to do that for a 37 year old who has seriously injured his back twice, hasn't played a full season since 2012, and is at the end of his career? You don't make a lot of sense here.
You always preach about Quality. Tell me how adding Glennon would be adding that much Quality? enough with all of those backups or journey guys that aren't good enough to stick.
We have to draft our guy and get him ready and prepared. Adding Romo would buy us time in developing that drafted guy - that could be a QB like Kizer, Mahomes or Webb. Romo is above average when he is healthy, Glennon isn't. Add to that that Glennon will end up overpaid and I don't understand how one would really be interested in him as starter.
Romo is going to cost just as much as Gennon or damn close. I don't think either offers a major benefit over the other.
See how that quoting thing works? Anyway...you don't want us to over pay for a much younger qb who hasn't seriously injured his back twice, but want us to do that for a 37 year old who has seriously injured his back twice, hasn't played a full season since 2012, and is at the end of his career? You don't make a lot of sense here.
You always preach about Quality. Tell me how adding Glennon would be adding that much Quality? enough with all of those backups or journey guys that aren't good enough to stick.
We have to draft our guy and get him ready and prepared. Adding Romo would buy us time in developing that drafted guy - that could be a QB like Kizer, Mahomes or Webb. Romo is above average when he is healthy, Glennon isn't. Add to that that Glennon will end up overpaid and I don't understand how one would really be interested in him as starter.
I view Glennon as better than anything on our roster currently, barring Cutler perhaps. As for the first part of your second paragraph, I agree, I just don't agree that adding Romo buys us any time because Romo...in case you haven't been paying attention, hasn't played a full season since 2012. Thats 4 years. He's had 2 serious back injuries, has a penchant for breaking his collarbone, and is 37. Add that to the fact Romo will end up being overpaid and I really don't understand why you're interested in him as a starter.
Bills hiring Rick Dennison a good sign for Tyrod Taylor?
NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported Friday on Good Morning Football that it could be good news for the Bills' incumbent quarterback.
"For Tyrod Taylor, who some people assume is gone from Buffalo, this is pretty good news. Because this was the quarterbacks coach in Baltimore when Tyrod Taylor was the back to Joe Flacco...so there is a lot of familiarity here," Rapoport said. "It would make no sense if the Bills hired Rick Dennison and got rid of Tyrod Taylor, one of the reasons (Dennison) signed there. So do not be surprised if Taylor is back, maybe on some sort of restructured contract for cap reasons. But this is very good news for the Bills' starter."
Dennison spent just one season with Taylor in Baltimore in 2014, before following Gary Kubiak to Denver in 2015. The offenses under Dennison in both Houston and Denver -- run-first operations, with heavy play-action and bootlegs -- might be a better signal for Taylor's chances of returning than a deep-seeded familiarity stemming from one season.
The previous relationship, however, shouldn't be discounted. The Broncos even reportedly tried to bring Taylor to Denver when he was a free agent in 2015.
If Dennison and Taylor are a mutual fit, the contract situation becomes the next issue. The Bills must decide whether to pick up the option that would guarantee Taylor more than $30 million. Buffalo has never seemed inclined to take on that sort of commitment to a quarterback they benched in Week 17.
Would Dennison's presence nudge the franchise to commit to Taylor or for the quarterback to agree to renegotiate his contract instead of hitting the open market and see what others might pay?
You always preach about Quality. Tell me how adding Glennon would be adding that much Quality? enough with all of those backups or journey guys that aren't good enough to stick.
We have to draft our guy and get him ready and prepared. Adding Romo would buy us time in developing that drafted guy - that could be a QB like Kizer, Mahomes or Webb. Romo is above average when he is healthy, Glennon isn't. Add to that that Glennon will end up overpaid and I don't understand how one would really be interested in him as starter.
I view Glennon as better than anything on our roster currently, barring Cutler perhaps. As for the first part of your second paragraph, I agree, I just don't agree that adding Romo buys us any time because Romo...in case you haven't been paying attention, hasn't played a full season since 2012. Thats 4 years. He's had 2 serious back injuries, has a penchant for breaking his collarbone, and is 37. Add that to the fact Romo will end up being overpaid and I really don't understand why you're interested in him as a starter.
you are the one begging Pace to add Talent to the roster and Romos only ? is health. He played 15 and 15 games before those past 2 years. He won't be overpaid, especially when Glennon will get that same amout.
I view Glennon as better than anything on our roster currently, barring Cutler perhaps. As for the first part of your second paragraph, I agree, I just don't agree that adding Romo buys us any time because Romo...in case you haven't been paying attention, hasn't played a full season since 2012. Thats 4 years. He's had 2 serious back injuries, has a penchant for breaking his collarbone, and is 37. Add that to the fact Romo will end up being overpaid and I really don't understand why you're interested in him as a starter.
you are the one begging Pace to add Talent to the roster and Romos only ? is health. He played 15 and 15 games before those past 2 years. He won't be overpaid, especially when Glennon will get that same amout.
No....thats not his only question. He's got an age question, and a salary question as well. And the health question is a pretty big one. And I don't care what he did before he suffered a back injury thats usually found in senior citizens.
Post by germansbombedph on Jan 23, 2017 7:53:22 GMT -6
now it's almost only 2 years with injuries instead of 4. Not to mention that a starting QB for 15 Million isn't much or rich. Romo is a proven starting QB that is above average. He can read a D and be a leader. That's proven over the time. The only Question is the biggest and that is health. I think he will be healthy and if he will be, he's our best Option. Go with Romo, draft your QB within the first 2 picks and go D with the other. Make the Team better Overall.