Question - 2nd best O or 2nd best D

Lets see how the Combines come out, i'd be more inclined to take the 2nd rated qb.

This is a great question and I think something that many are asking themselves, but I hesitate to answer. The best answer I have is... it depends

I would have to go with the person left on the board that has the potential to have the biggest impact on the team. Ordinarily that would be QB, especially for a QB starved team like ourselves. However, one QB is probably going to be off the board. I don;t know if that will be the guy that we had targeted. Nor do I know if the guy we targeted is really the best QB (odds say no). So if our QB guy is there, then for sure QB. If not, then you have to weigh whether or not the QB that is left will have more impact than the other guy to be chosen. Ordinarily it would be QB hands down as the biggest difference maker, but a so-so QB won't have as big an impact as a killer rusher.

So it depends on who is left and where we have them (which probably won;t be where they really belong anyway.

But in a vacuum, I'd have to say QB.

I take Allen over any of these QBs 10 out of 10 times.

None of these QBs are worth the top 5 pick. Don't let one game cloud your judgement on Watson.

Cleveland has the luxury of not picking a QB this year because they'll have the first pick again next year and can try then.