I get most of my news from radio, don't read much if anything.
Came up from I think Hub yesterday that another teams scout said he was clearly the better of the two. And Mully from the AM show said he thought he looked better during practices also.
I just went through my last several comments PS was brought up b/c when he got 10+ carries he looked really good, tends to be the standard for RB's to be judged, nothing I said, that I re read said he CLEARLY outplayed Langford. But Langford didn't really shine in any of the PS games either.
Sorry not buying into this idea that the coaches couldn't figure out that Howard was the better back when another teams scout and a schlub from a morning show could figure it out.
I get most of my news from radio, don't read much if anything.
Came up from I think Hub yesterday that another teams scout said he was clearly the better of the two. And Mully from the AM show said he thought he looked better during practices also.
I just went through my last several comments PS was brought up b/c when he got 10+ carries he looked really good, tends to be the standard for RB's to be judged, nothing I said, that I re read said he CLEARLY outplayed Langford. But Langford didn't really shine in any of the PS games either.
Sorry not buying into this idea that the coaches couldn't figure out that Howard was the better back when another teams scout and a schlub from a morning show could figure it out.
You're right. Hub said before the season started that Howard would be the starting RB by the second half of the season. He knew Howard was the better back.
I get most of my news from radio, don't read much if anything.
Came up from I think Hub yesterday that another teams scout said he was clearly the better of the two. And Mully from the AM show said he thought he looked better during practices also.
I just went through my last several comments PS was brought up b/c when he got 10+ carries he looked really good, tends to be the standard for RB's to be judged, nothing I said, that I re read said he CLEARLY outplayed Langford. But Langford didn't really shine in any of the PS games either.
Sorry not buying into this idea that the coaches couldn't figure out that Howard was the better back when another teams scout and a schlub from a morning show could figure it out.
Especially when someone watching practices could see it but Fox & Co couldn't? Shit hire that dude then. He's better than who's coaching now.
See what Hawk said, it wasn't just Mully, Hub saw it to, and another teams scout. So again I question how the teams HC/OC didn't.
And how many times has Hub been wrong? I'm pretty sure he was on record saying the Kyle Long pick was bad.
This is the standard play by many sports analysts. Make a lot of radical predictions and then have one come true and act like you're some kind of prophet while ignoring all the other predictions that you were wrong about.
See what Hawk said, it wasn't just Mully, Hub saw it to, and another teams scout. So again I question how the teams HC/OC didn't.
And how many times has Hub been wrong? I'm pretty sure he was on record saying the Kyle Long pick was bad.
This is the standard play by many sports analysts. Make a lot of radical predictions and then have one come true and act like you're some kind of prophet while ignoring all the other predictions that you were wrong about.
I tried that but I didn't have any that were right
I get most of my news from radio, don't read much if anything.
Came up from I think Hub yesterday that another teams scout said he was clearly the better of the two. And Mully from the AM show said he thought he looked better during practices also.
I just went through my last several comments PS was brought up b/c when he got 10+ carries he looked really good, tends to be the standard for RB's to be judged, nothing I said, that I re read said he CLEARLY outplayed Langford. But Langford didn't really shine in any of the PS games either.
Sorry not buying into this idea that the coaches couldn't figure out that Howard was the better back when another teams scout and a schlub from a morning show could figure it out.
You're right. Hub said before the season started that Howard would be the starting RB by the second half of the season. He knew Howard was the better back.
I don't know how many times I can repeat myself when it comes to coaches in this league and rookie backs. It's league wide, unless your name is Ezekiel Elliot and you're a top 5 pick.
See what Hawk said, it wasn't just Mully, Hub saw it to, and another teams scout. So again I question how the teams HC/OC didn't.
And how many times has Hub been wrong? I'm pretty sure he was on record saying the Kyle Long pick was bad.
This is the standard play by many sports analysts. Make a lot of radical predictions and then have one come true and act like you're some kind of prophet while ignoring all the other predictions that you were wrong about.
Hub has been right FAR more then he has been wrong. And to be fair, before pre season was over he admitted it was a good pick; so apparently watching TC and PS he has a really good read on things.
And how many times has Hub been wrong? I'm pretty sure he was on record saying the Kyle Long pick was bad.
This is the standard play by many sports analysts. Make a lot of radical predictions and then have one come true and act like you're some kind of prophet while ignoring all the other predictions that you were wrong about.
Hub has been right FAR more then he has been wrong. And to be fair, before pre season was over he admitted it was a good pick; so apparently watching TC and PS he has a really good read on things.
SOooooooo try again.
You have actual numbers to back that up? Like actual percentages? Why is Hub a journalist when he's robbing the football world of his prophet-like abilities? Hell I guess if the Bears hired him we could dump the whole scouting department. Drafting nothing but pro bowlers for the next ten years.
Hub often tells Bears fans stuff they don't want to hear. But he's usually right on. Not always. And he has ticked me off a lot of times over the years when he is critical of something Bears related - but usually he is right. He just tells it like it is.