Bears interviewed DC Vic Fangio for head coaching position Esten McLarenJan 3 2018, 2:56 PM The Chicago Bears interviewed defensive coordinator Vic Fangio for their head coaching position Wednesday.
Fangio has served as the Bears' DC since 2015. He has experience in the same position with the San Francisco 49ers, Baltimore Ravens, Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, and Carolina Panthers.
He has never held a head coaching position, either in the NFL or at the college level.
Bears interviewed Vic Fangio for head coach opening Wednesday Posted by Josh Alper on January 3, 2018, 2:55 PM EST AP
The Bears have put together a group of outside candidates for the head coaching vacancy created when they fired John Fox this week, but they’ll also consider someone from Fox’s staff.
The team announced on Wednesday that defensive coordinator Vic Fangio interviewed for the job. The team said General Manager Ryan Pace conducted the interview.
Fangio has been a coordinator for several NFL teams since getting that job with the Panthers in 1995 and spent one year at Stanford in 2010 before returning to the pros on Jim Harbaugh’s 49ers staff in 2011. He moved to Chicago when Fox was hired in 2015.
The Bears defense took some positive strides in the last few years and the offense-leaning makeup of their coaching candidate list suggested there is some hope that Fangio can stay to keep working with the unit. If Fangio did well on Wednesday, he may be staying around with a promotion.
Post by dachuckster on Jan 3, 2018 14:34:32 GMT -6
I really hope it works out so that Fangio sticks around.
I heard on the radio that he is the 2nd highest paid DC in the NFL at something between $2 million and $2.5 million per year. Hopefully we can get a solid offensive oriented HC who is comfortable with delegating most/all of the defense to Vic.
Hopefully it was a sincere interview and not just one of those "courtesy flush" jobs Emery did with Toub.
My concern is continuity on the O side with the development of Trubisky at stake. If we hire a hot shot OC, we may lose him in a year and Trubisky becomes Cutler 2.0 going through countless coordinators. Think we need a HC strong on the O side and qb development. Vince as assistant HC enough enticement to stay?
Hopefully it was a sincere interview and not just one of those "courtesy flush" jobs Emery did with Toub.
My concern is continuity on the O side with the development of Trubisky at stake. If we hire a hot shot OC, we may lose him in a year and Trubisky becomes Cutler 2.0 going through countless coordinators. Think we need a HC strong on the O side and qb development. Vince as assistant HC enough enticement to stay?
Maybe but that would be up to the new HC. Vic with a strong OC might work fine too. It did in Minny.
Hopefully it was a sincere interview and not just one of those "courtesy flush" jobs Emery did with Toub.
My concern is continuity on the O side with the development of Trubisky at stake. If we hire a hot shot OC, we may lose him in a year and Trubisky becomes Cutler 2.0 going through countless coordinators. Think we need a HC strong on the O side and qb development. Vince as assistant HC enough enticement to stay?
My concern is continuity on the O side with the development of Trubisky at stake. If we hire a hot shot OC, we may lose him in a year and Trubisky becomes Cutler 2.0 going through countless coordinators. Think we need a HC strong on the O side and qb development. Vince as assistant HC enough enticement to stay?
Maybe but that would be up to the new HC. Vic with a strong OC might work fine too. It did in Minny.
And after 1.5 seasons as a successful OC, what is going to happen in Minnesota after Shurmur leaves?
Zimmer is a good HC but it will be an interesting exercise tom compare the performance of Keenum & Bradford under a new OC against what they achieved under Turner and Shurmur.