Pittsburgh got screwed by the refs!

I hate to be the dick, but his opposite hand comes off the ball, which makes it look like the ground helped him complete the catch. The Miller one was BS b/c it reversed the call on what was well less then indisputable evidence. This one you could at least see why they did it.

Break down what happens here. 1) he gets both hands on it. 2) he doesn't make a football move, merely twists his body and outstretchees his hands as his knee comes down. 3) his far hand comes off the ball, as it hits the ground and the ball moves, even if only slightly.
If he catches and then takes a few steps and then dives, it's a catch. If he keeps both hands on the ball it's a catch. If his hand comes off the ball, but it doesn't touch the ground or move it's a catch. This is nothing like the Miller reverse at all, where there is no angle where you see the ball move, there is no angle where you really see anything.

They've overcomplicated the rules for a catch to be sure, and one of the things the NFL really needs to do is go back and figure out the catch rule. But this isn't an example.