LINK to the entire article "Coach John Fox asserted Trubisky had perhaps the best game of his rookie season when he completed 12 of 15 passes for 102 yards in Sunday’s 15-14 loss to the 49ers at Soldier Field.
If that’s Trubisky’s best, he has a long, long way to go to become the franchise quarterback the organization is pining for him to be. The completion percentage is great, but there’s no football world in which 6.8 yards per attempt approaches “best” anything, even though that’s above Trubisky’s 6.4 average for the season."
Opponents can cover recievers tightly without fear of getting beaten over the top because the Bears aren’t even taking shots to keep defensive backs honest. They have six completions of 30 or more yards all season, and one belongs to punter Pat O’Donnell. The last one came Nov. 19 against the Lions, three opponents ago.
All of a sudden, the Bears aren’t running the ball with any success, which they accomplished earlier in the season, so the odds of them putting together 70- or 80-yard scoring drives are diminishing. They totaled only 147 yards the entire game against the woeful 49ers.
Yes, the Bears have a massive depth chart problem at wide receiver that hinders their vertical passing game. No one will dispute that. They still need to take shots to try to pick up some chunk gains, attempts that will, if nothing else, make opposing cornerbacks think twice before squatting on every underneath route.
Challenge Trubisky. Challenge the wide receivers. Challenge the offensive line to block it up. At 3-9, there’s nothing to lose.
we could lose the QB to injury. mostly i agree. Bears should be passing more. no attempt has been made to ease MT into anything. he just went out there and has been handcuffed every game. it would be one thing if we saw more diverse playcalling as MT gained exp. I don't think just, "open up the passing game" works anymore than "just let him throw in the 2min drill" does.
It actually wouldn't be a bad idea to shelve Mitch for the rest of the year either. He's gotten his feet wet and now with his pass protection beginning to break down and no effective running game he's a sitting duck. I don't see a whole lot of good coming out of playing him but I do see plenty of bad.
It actually wouldn't be a bad idea to shelve Mitch for the rest of the year either. He's gotten his feet wet and now with his pass protection beginning to break down and no effective running game he's a sitting duck. I don't see a whole lot of good coming out of playing him but I do see plenty of bad.
I thought about that. The only thing that worries me is that we probably started him when we shouldn't have (I'm thinking about Trubisky here, not the team and the Glennon fiasco). So we trot the guy out there, and the team looks like total crap (the team). Mitch has tried to be a leader, and it seems like the players do respect him very much now - even though the team is losing. Now, if they bench the guy, what does that do to his confidence - and the team's confidence in him as their new leader?
Maybe it is okay. But either way it is not too good. Allowing him to be in there with this coaching staff isn't good for his confidence. Benching him is also not so good for his confidence. And so much of a QBs development is tied to his confidence and the mental part of the game. The entire situation sucks.
It actually wouldn't be a bad idea to shelve Mitch for the rest of the year either. He's gotten his feet wet and now with his pass protection beginning to break down and no effective running game he's a sitting duck. I don't see a whole lot of good coming out of playing him but I do see plenty of bad.
I thought about that. The only thing that worries me is that we probably started him when we shouldn't have (I'm thinking about Trubisky here, not the team and the Glennon fiasco). So we trot the guy out there, and the team looks like total crap (the team). Mitch has tried to be a leader, and it seems like the players do respect him very much now - even though the team is losing. Now, if they bench the guy, what does that do to his confidence - and the team's confidence in him as their new leader?
Maybe it is okay. But either way it is not too good. Allowing him to be in there with this coaching staff isn't good for his confidence. Benching him is also not so good for his confidence. And so much of a QBs development is tied to his confidence and the mental part of the game. The entire situation sucks.
The rationale for doing it would work much better if it came from Pace who made it clear why he demanded it be done. Focks is not the guy to make this call. Hell, for all I care they can say he developed a hang nail on his throwing hand and he's goin' on IR. Give Focks back his vets. Play Glennon one game and Butt Fumble the next.
He needed to play and he has. Now half the team is hurt or simply mailing it in so what more can be gained by him playing? It's all he could do to survive so far and from here on it only gets worse. Why expose him to the mental and physical risks. Mop up time is for mop up QBs and like it or not we have four games of mop up time ahead.
If I'm hosting a jam and the players who take the stage can't even play a 12 bar blues tune without screwing it up my confidence in my playing won't be upset by sitting it out and neither should Mitch's. We can't treat adults like they're 8 years olds playing their first Little League or Pop Warner game for cryin' out loud. He'll adapt just fine.