There’s no question the short passing game — as well as the downfield passing game — was flawed last season. I don’t have an answer to your first question, but according to Aaron Schatz of Football Outsiders, the Bears ranked 32nd in the NFL in average yards after the catch (6.9) for passes thrown at or behind the line of scrimmage. They also ranked last in yards after the catch (2.8) for passes thrown beyond the line of scrimmage. The league averages, per Schatz, were 8.8 and 4.1.
Cohen actually gained 19 yards on nine catches in the 36-25 loss to the Saints. As I wrote on Twitter during the game, that’s really hard to do. According to Pro Football Reference, only one player in NFL history has had fewer yards with nine or more catches in a game dating to 1940. Jets running back Adrian Murrell caught nine passes for 12 yards in a 12-0 loss to the Saints on Dec. 24, 1995. It was a season-long issue when you consider Cohen averaged only 5.8 yards per catch, well off his 10.2 mark in 2018. The Bears struggled to get him the ball in space effectively, just as they had a difficult time getting other targets free in space for those short throws that are such a big part of the offense. We’re going to see similar stuff this season, some of it as part of the run-pass options in the scheme, so the Bears will have to hope they are much more effective.
the O w/no TE's doesn't work and w/only ARob and Cohen viewed as a threat easily shut down. You cannot scheme people open when you don't have people.
The TE position was a major disappointment of course (Packers have had the same problem for years). And it's easy to blame the Bears' overall receiving corps. But, that's a bit of a cop out. It's not Kansas City of course but ARob-Miller-Gabriel wasn't an awful WR-trio either.
Apparently, the GM agreed as he didn't add anything to the WR-group other than a late-5th rounder who probably will see little action this year. Ginn just replaces Gabriel.
"Scheming guys open" was less a problem than having a QB who could identify quickly the best place to go with the ball and deliver it accurately, on-time, and in-stride. Go back and watch some Bears games from last year. The typical Trubisky performance was 1-2 beautiful throws per game and the rest was pretty much trash. Like I pointed out multiple times last season, he rarely hit anything more than 10-15 yards beyond the LOS that wasn't a stop-route. He missed deep balls that would have been big gains and TDs over and over. No surprise that YAC sucked, even without having a Tyreek Hill on the roster. Defenses could afford to cheat up and contest the short stuff knowing that Trubisky wasn't likely to hurt them consistently in the mid-range and beyond.
Yes, we all know the Bears' offensive struggles last year were multi-factorial but the biggest factor by far was that they were trying to run the offense with a mobile version of Christian Ponder or Blake Bortles at QB.
the O w/no TE's doesn't work and w/only ARob and Cohen viewed as a threat easily shut down. You cannot scheme people open when you don't have people.
The TE position was a major disappointment of course (Packers have had the same problem for years). And it's easy to blame the Bears' overall receiving corps. But, that's a bit of a cop out. It's not Kansas City of course but ARob-Miller-Gabriel wasn't an awful WR-trio either.
Apparently, the GM agreed as he didn't add anything to the WR-group other than a late-5th rounder who probably will see little action this year. Ginn just replaces Gabriel.
"Scheming guys open" was less a problem than having a QB who could identify quickly the best place to go with the ball and deliver it accurately, on-time, and in-stride. Go back and watch some Bears games from last year. The typical Trubisky performance was 1-2 beautiful throws per game and the rest was pretty much trash. Like I pointed out multiple times last season, he rarely hit anything more than 10-15 yards beyond the LOS that wasn't a stop-route. He missed deep balls that would have been big gains and TDs over and over. No surprise that YAC sucked, even without having a Tyreek Hill on the roster. Defenses could afford to cheat up and contest the short stuff knowing that Trubisky wasn't likely to hurt them consistently in the mid-range and beyond.
Yes, we all know the Bears' offensive struggles last year were multi-factorial but the biggest factor by far was that they were trying to run the offense with a mobile version of Christian Ponder or Blake Bortles at QB.
QB was problem to, we all know that, but the TE's weren't a disappointment, they weren't there, they were non existent for a system that relies on them to create spacing and 1x1 matchups, and sometimes 1x0 matchups which creates yac.
They didn't add wr's b/c they drafted Miller 2 years go and Riley last year and have Wims. But still added speed from the draft and in FA, b/c after Gabriel went down they lost that also. So the one area of concern they hit twice.
What they did at qb was add competition so they have a quality starter no matter who and a quality backup no matter who.
I'll state this again, nfl people at the combine said they had lost confidence in Tru, but also said no qb would have succeeded last year w/how it all fell apart around him, comes right from the Hoge/Jahns podcast, not exactly 2 pro Mitch guys.
Post by paytonisgod on May 13, 2020 20:09:45 GMT -6
It's tough to get yards after a catch when the guys who are supposed to be blocking for the screen miss their blocks. It also didn't help that DBs could freely crowd the line due to a lack of real downfield threat and be on the receiver like white on rice.
Again no system is going to work without proper execution.