Loaded draft at CB - here's the top-20 (WalterFootball)

The flip side of this whole thing is that building a team in preparation for a QB also has its pitfalls. It can take a decade to get the right QB. Chicago is one of the franchises that are in that boat. Cleveland has not had a good QB in forever either.
So a team can be good but go into decline and have to be rebuilt all over again before a QB is found.
The real requirement is a guy that knows talent and can draft. I think Pace my be one. However, even a really good GM has a hard time finding a QB. The Pats had no idea that Brady would be as good as he is. They lucked onto him. If they knew he would have been their first pick that year.
Dallas had no idea with Dak. There is really a huge question in my mind if there is anyone that knows how to see QB talent. You have your sure winners like Manning and Luck, but even with them, you'd think they were as close to a sure thing as possible but you had no idea how good they would be in the NFL.

It's a tough road.

Houst has done well? Sorry how many playoff wins does Houston have? SF had a good core after it drafted it's QB(alex smith) then he got hurt and they went w/their backup(2nd rounder) and stayed w/the hot hand. They did not ignore the qb position until their team was good; after the qb position went to hell, so did the team. The Browns have at least 2 times, and looking like possibly a 3rd time ignored the qb position w/the their highest 1st round pick, and went w/another position, and went w/a lower tier qb; and they are still crap. 

Rookie QB's need a good OL, good run game and a couple reliable targets. That's all they need, they don't need a great def or st's. 

I think it comes down to your teams ability to find their qb. If they do they'll start winning. The easiest way to know and get your guy is to get him high in the first, after that it's all a crap shoot where they could go. Therein lies the issue. Listen I get the idea of getting the generational talent first, they just aren't  there in this draft. It's Garrett and maybe Fournette and everyone else though. And again, I see no way the Bear buck the trend of not drafting DB's inside the top 5, ie 1-4. If they trade back fine, grab one of those top fs's and build more draft picks. But in a "weak" qb class I don't see how  taking one in rds 2-4 is somehow the better option.